In a more private mail,>>>>> "KH" == Kurt Hornik
<hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
KH> Currently,
KH> opar <- par()
KH> par(opar)
KH> gives
KH> Warning messages:
KH> 1: parameter "cin" can't be set in: par(args)
KH> 2: parameter "cra" can't be set in: par(args)
KH> 3: parameter "csi" can't be set in: par(args)
KH> 4: parameter "din" can't be set in: par(args)
That's why we have
opar <- par(no.readonly = TRUE)
par(opar)
Only last weekend, when trying to polish "p.sunflowers(),
I read a (latex) printout of ?par
and found several things that I want to add/improve.
The above example is one of them.
Martin
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._