Prashanth Sundaram wrote:> Rich,
>
> I specify the individual host’s FQDN in the replication agreement.
So, ldap01.domain.com ?
Maybe openldap/openssl has a problem with subjectAltName? Try mozldap
ldapsearch instead like this:
/usr/lib/mozldap/ldapsearch -h FQDN -ZZZ -P /etc/dirsrv/slapd-instance
-s base -b "" "objectclass=*"> I use haproxy for LB, so the hosts are in ACTIVE-PASSIVE state.
>
>
> Prashanth Sundaram wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Which one of the case below is suitable for a Multi-Master
> replication. I have a load balancer with/ ldap.domain.com,/ which
> is what clients will use to authenticate.
>
> *_Question:
> _*Which one is a better implementation? What are the trade-offs?
> Please input your feedback as it might be useful for someone
> coming this way later. This can serve as a knowledge bank.
>
> Case-I
> ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap01.domain.com,
> subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
> ldap02: server-cert with cn=ldap02.domain.com,
> subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
> -MMR with tls throws error when “*Check hostname against name in
> certificate for outbound SSL connections”* option is enabled. But
> RH recommends it to be turned ON.
>
> What is the FQDN you specified in the replication agreement?
>
>
> Case-II
> ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com,
> subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com, ldap02.domain.com ldap01:
> server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com,
> subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com,ldap02.domain.com -Does not comply
> with the requirement that “server-cert” should have hostname as
> cn.I found this method working perfectly fine.
>
> *Knowledge Sharing:
> *Here’s a useful link which I use all the time and look before
> posting to the list. This is the archive for the mailing list and
> has /search/ feature which very useful.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-directory-users redhat
> com/info.html
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Date Prev
>
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00006.html>
> ][Date Next
>
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00008.html>
> ] [Thread Prev
>
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00006.html>
> ][Thread Next
>
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/msg00008.html>
> ] [Thread Index
>
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/thread.html#00007>
> ] [Date Index
>
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/date.html#00007>
> ] [Author Index
>
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2010-January/author.html#00007>
> ]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>