I believe that was the *goal* of 2.0, but unfortunately, that lofty goal was not
met, the timeline of which seemed to stretch from when Sun purchased Lustre
until some time in the far future.
See here for the features available in 2.0:
http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php/Lustre_2.0_Features
-Jason Temple
-----Original Message-----
From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org [mailto:lustre-discuss-bounces
at lists.lustre.org] On Behalf Of David Noriega
Sent: marted?, 5. ottobre 2010 16:54
To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-discuss] Metadata performance question
If I''m wrong please let me know, but my understanding of how lustre
1.8 works is metadata is only accessible from a single host. So should
there be alot of activity, the metadata server becomes a bottleneck.
But I''ve heard that in ver 2.x that we''ll be able to setup
multiple
machines for metadata just like for the OSSs, and that should cut down
on a bottleneck when accessing metadata information.
--
Personally, I liked the university. They gave us money and facilities,
we didn''t have to produce anything! You''ve never been out of
college!
You don''t know what it''s like out there! I''ve worked
in the private
sector. They expect results. -Ray Ghostbusters
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss