Does anyone know if the KB is still being maintained? if so, where is the URL for it? TIA
The KB has been migrated to the Lustre manual: http://manual.lustre.org/manual/LustreManual16_HTML/KnowledgeBase.html#50548891_pgfId-1288153 The KB is not actively maintained. Sheila Mag Gam wrote:> Does anyone know if the KB is still being maintained? if so, where is > the URL for it? > > TIA > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
Darn, Any possibility we revive this on the wiki? The KB is very useful. On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Sheila Barthel <Sheila.Barthel at sun.com> wrote:> The KB has been migrated to the Lustre manual: > http://manual.lustre.org/manual/LustreManual16_HTML/KnowledgeBase.html#50548891_pgfId-1288153 > > The KB is not actively maintained. > > Sheila > > Mag Gam wrote: >> >> Does anyone know if the KB is still being maintained? if so, where is >> the URL for it? >> >> TIA >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> > >
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Mag Gam <magawake at gmail.com> wrote:> > Any possibility we revive this on the wiki? The KB is very useful.It really does feel like the wiki has been abandoned. Lots of very outdated information prominently displayed.
Yes who do we speak to get lots of that stuff removed? Most of the questions on the news groups are redundant, it would be very nice to put a FAQ /KB on the Wiki On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Aaron Porter <atporter at gmail.com> wrote:> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Mag Gam <magawake at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Any possibility we revive this on the wiki? The KB is very useful. > > It really does feel like the wiki has been abandoned. Lots of very > outdated information prominently displayed. > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
On Mar 31, 2009 22:16 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:> Yes who do we speak to get lots of that stuff removed? Most of the > questions on the news groups are redundant, it would be very nice to > put a FAQ /KB on the WikiThe Wiki is a shared resource. If you feel that the information there is incomplete or inaccurate, anyone is free to change it. In some cases you need to create an account (which can be done yourself with normal anti-spam protection).> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Aaron Porter <atporter at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Mag Gam <magawake at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Any possibility we revive this on the wiki? The KB is very useful. > > > > It really does feel like the wiki has been abandoned. Lots of very > > outdated information prominently displayed.Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Andreas Dilger <adilger at sun.com> wrote:> The Wiki is a shared resource. ?If you feel that the information there > is incomplete or inaccurate, anyone is free to change it. ?In some cases > you need to create an account (which can be done yourself with normal > anti-spam protection).As a lustre-newbie, I''d be perfectly happy and qualified to *remove* content that is obviously wrong, but as I''m still trying to acquaint myself with the system I''m not yet in any position to author the documents -- only to be increasingly frustrated by how few of them "work".