ken oh
2008-Jul-17 07:33 UTC
[Fedora-directory-users] Single master or multiple master for Active Directory Sync
Hello everybody,
I would like to know what''s the best replica role option between single
master and multiple master when you configure the database for an Active
Directory sync.
I''ve got another question : Is it possible to synchronize AD and FDS if
AD is in native mode ?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr
Andrew C. Dingman
2008-Jul-17 11:13 UTC
Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Single master or multiple master for Active Directory Sync
On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 07:33 +0000, ken oh wrote:> I would like to know what''s the best replica role option between > single master and multiple master when you configure the database for > an Active Directory sync. > > > I''ve got another question : Is it possible to synchronize AD and FDS > if AD is in native mode ?Yes, I''ve done this with Red Hat Directory Server. AD in native mode looks from the outside like a slightly quirky LDAP server with oddball schema, paired with a slightly quirky Kerberos infrastructure. That''s a lot easier to deal with than old-style NT domains, as I understand it. As for the replication bit, I''d set that up however makes sense for the FDS deployment. I don''t think it''s going to make much difference to the AD sync, though AD sync with one master is all you need.