On 5/25/07, prashant <prashant@bluebarracuda.com>
wrote:>
> Hi Guys,
> I am investigating to install a Cluster file system on my web servers.
>
> I came across CODA and Lustre.
Do you mean the AFS off-shoot CODA? It''s hardly in stable state and I
am not
even sure how it''s being maintained currently -- maybe someone else can
tell
us more. From prior experience, CODA offered better disconnected usage
(designed for mobile users), but that too was a bit clunky. My tests were
quite limited however.
AFS & CODA are distributed clusters -- they''re worlds apart from
Lustre.
Maybe you can email us what you''re looking to achieve with your setup.
Also: has anyone looked at gluster? http://www.gluster.org. Quite
interesting.
I have 2 question though to finally select one of the 2.>
> 1. Which one is better in terms of performance - (Disk IO and multi
> server replication)
> 2. Which has more features and functionalities.
>
> Many thanks for your answers.
>
> Prashant
>
--
Mustafa A. Hashmi
mahashmi@gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.clusterfs.com/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20070525/a83d7e5d/attachment-0001.html