linuxman
2006-May-19 07:36 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms?
Thanks cliffw first! I have followed your advice and correct the grub.con and /etc/fstab, user root=/dev/sda1 instead of LABEL..., but failed either, the error message when boot up is: Mounted /proc filesystem Mouting sysfs Creating /dev Starting udev Loading scsi_mod.ko module SCSI subsystem initialized Loading sd_mod.ko module Loading libata.ko module Loading sata_nv.ko module Loading dm-mod.ko module device-mapper:............................. Loding jbd.ko module Loading ext3.ko module Creating root device Mounting root filesystem mount: error 6 mounting ext3 mount: error 2 mounting none Switching to new root switchroot: mount failed: 22 umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 Kernel panic............... So, it seems that root device is created successfully, but can not be mounted. BTW, I use sata harddisk, so sata_nv is loaded. Also, I have tried to recompile the prepatched Lustre kernel 2.6.9-5.0.5, and compiled ext3 and sata_nv into kernel, but get similar error message as below: ====The exact message from screen==Mounted /proc filesystem Mouting sysfs Creating /dev Starting udev Creating root device Mounting root filesystem mount: error 6 mounting ext3 mount: error 2 mounting none Switching to new root switchroot: mount failed: 22 umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 Kernel panic............... ================================= So, what''s wrong with my installation? Thanks for any help! bests, Su Baochen> -----????----- > ???: cliff white [mailto:cliffw@clusterfs.com] > ????: 2005?12?1? 8:51 > ???: linuxman > ??: lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > ??: Re: [Lustre-discuss] ??: [Lustre-discuss] Re: > [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on > x86_64 platforms? > > linuxman wrote: > > Again, I install CentOS 4.2 on AMD Althon 64 3000+ and lustre > > 1.4.5.95(precomplied lustre kernel), but get below message > when boot > > up failed(copy from the screen): > > > > Red Hat nash version 4.2.1.6 starting > > Mounted /proc filesystem > > Mounting sysfs > > Creating /dev > > Starting udev > > Loading scsi_mod.ko module > > SCSI subsystem initialized > > Loading sd_mod.ko module > > Loading libata.ko module > > Loading sata_nv.ko module > > Loading dm-md.ko module > > device-mapper: 4.1.0-ioctl(2003-12-10) initialised: > dm@uk.sistina.com > > Loading jbd.ko module Loading ext3.ko.module Creating root device > > mkrootdev: label / not found > > Mounting root filesystem > > mount: error 2 mounting ext3 > > mount: error 2 mounting none > > Switching to new root > > switchroot: mount failed: 22 > > umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempting to kill init! > > > > My grub.conf is as below: > > > > # grub.conf generated by anaconda > > # > > # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making > changes to this > > file # NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that > > # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg. > > # root (hd0,0) > > # kernel /boot/vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sda1 > > # initrd /boot/initrd-version.img > > #boot=/dev/sda > > default=1 > > timeout=5 > > splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz > > hiddenmenu > > title CentOS (2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp) > > root (hd0,0) > > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp ro > > root=LABEL=/ > > initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp.img > > title CentOS-4 x86_64 (2.6.9-22.EL) > > root (hd0,0) > > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-22.EL ro root=LABEL=/ > > initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-22.EL.img > > > > My fstab is as below: > > > > # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see ''man fstab-sync'' > for details > > LABEL=/ / ext3 > defaults 1 1 > > none /dev/pts devpts > gid=5,mode=620 0 0 > > none /dev/shm tmpfs > defaults 0 0 > > none /proc proc > defaults 0 0 > > none /sys sysfs > defaults 0 0 > > LABEL=SWAP-sda2 swap swap > defaults 0 0 > > /dev/hdb /media/cdrom auto > > > pamconsole,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,noauto > ,managed 0 0 > > /dev/sdc /media/usbdisk vfat > > > pamconsole,noatime,sync,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,n > > oauto, > > managed 0 0 > > > > So, I don''t know what''s wrong with my installation? Any > hints? Thanks > > in advance! > > > > It perhaps is an issue with the disk labels. > Try this: > In grub.conf, change the root=LABEL=/ to the actual device > (root=/dev/sda1, if sda1 is your root partition) Make the > same change in your /etc/fstab. > Best > cliffw > > > Bests, > > > > Su Baochen > > > > > >>-----????----- > >>???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > >>[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? Kumaran Rajaram > >>????: 2005?12?1? 0:48 > >>???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > >>??: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: > >>[Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > >> > >>For 2.6.5-7.191, I used the precompiled Lustre kernel. The > rest were > >>customized kernels which were patched against Lustre patches. > >> > >>-Kums > >> > >> > >>>>>"linuxman" <linuxman@bloghome.cn> 11/30/05 9:25 am >>> > >> > >>Thanks Kums, > >> > >>And, you use precompiled lustre kernel or your customizied > kernel, or > >>compiled from prepatched lustre kernel? > >> > >> > >> > >>>-----????----- > >>>???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > >>>[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? > Kumaran Rajaram > >>>????: 2005?12?1? 0:09 > >>>???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > >>>??: Re: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > >>> > >>>Su, > >>> > >>> > >>>So , my question is, anyone have tried lustre 1.4.5 on AMD > >> > >>64 platform? > >> > >>>Any hints are helpful, and thanks in advance! > >>> > >>>We have Lustre 1.4.5 running on AMD 64 platform and have > tried over > >>>socknal and openibnal. We use SLES9 distro and kernels we use are > >>>2.6.5-7.191, 2.6.12.2, and 2.6.13-15. > >>> > >>>HTH, > >>>-Kums > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >>Lustre-discuss mailing list > >>Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > >>https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > >> > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > > Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
linuxman
2006-May-19 07:36 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms?
Latest news:-) I tried on another machine, which is AMD Athlon Sempron 64(2500+), CentOS 4.2 x86_64, lustre precompiled kernel just works fine! The harddisk is the same, sata 80G. So, I can conclude that, lustre 1.4.5 can not work on my Althon 64(socket 939, 3000+), but works on Sempron 64(socket 754,2500+), I don''t know why.... Any hints? Thanks in advance! Maybe something related to the montherboard ? Althon 64 runs on GA-K8N51GMF-9, and Sempron 64 runs on GA-K8VT800, for your information. Bests, Su Baochen> -----????----- > ???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > [mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? linuxman > ????: 2005?12?1? 10:15 > ???: lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > ??: [Lustre-discuss] ??: [Lustre-discuss] ??: > [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] > does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > > Thanks cliffw first! > > I have followed your advice and correct the grub.con and > /etc/fstab, user > root=/dev/sda1 instead of LABEL..., but failed either, the > error message when boot up is: > > Mounted /proc filesystem > Mouting sysfs > Creating /dev > Starting udev > Loading scsi_mod.ko module > SCSI subsystem initialized > Loading sd_mod.ko module > Loading libata.ko module > Loading sata_nv.ko module > Loading dm-mod.ko module > device-mapper:............................. > Loding jbd.ko module > Loading ext3.ko module > Creating root device > Mounting root filesystem > mount: error 6 mounting ext3 > mount: error 2 mounting none > Switching to new root > switchroot: mount failed: 22 > umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 > Kernel panic............... > > So, it seems that root device is created successfully, but > can not be mounted. > > BTW, I use sata harddisk, so sata_nv is loaded. > > Also, I have tried to recompile the prepatched Lustre kernel > 2.6.9-5.0.5, and compiled ext3 and sata_nv into kernel, but > get similar error message as > below: > > ====The exact message from screen==> Mounted /proc filesystem > Mouting sysfs > Creating /dev > Starting udev > Creating root device > Mounting root filesystem > mount: error 6 mounting ext3 > mount: error 2 mounting none > Switching to new root > switchroot: mount failed: 22 > umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 > Kernel panic............... > > =================================> > So, what''s wrong with my installation? Thanks for any help! > > bests, > > Su Baochen > > > > > -----????----- > > ???: cliff white [mailto:cliffw@clusterfs.com] > > ????: 2005?12?1? 8:51 > > ???: linuxman > > ??: lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > ??: Re: [Lustre-discuss] ??: [Lustre-discuss] Re: > > [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on > > x86_64 platforms? > > > > linuxman wrote: > > > Again, I install CentOS 4.2 on AMD Althon 64 3000+ and lustre > > > 1.4.5.95(precomplied lustre kernel), but get below message > > when boot > > > up failed(copy from the screen): > > > > > > Red Hat nash version 4.2.1.6 starting Mounted /proc filesystem > > > Mounting sysfs Creating /dev Starting udev Loading scsi_mod.ko > > > module SCSI subsystem initialized Loading sd_mod.ko > module Loading > > > libata.ko module Loading sata_nv.ko module Loading dm-md.ko module > > > device-mapper: 4.1.0-ioctl(2003-12-10) initialised: > > dm@uk.sistina.com > > > Loading jbd.ko module Loading ext3.ko.module Creating root device > > > mkrootdev: label / not found > > > Mounting root filesystem > > > mount: error 2 mounting ext3 > > > mount: error 2 mounting none > > > Switching to new root > > > switchroot: mount failed: 22 > > > umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempting to kill init! > > > > > > My grub.conf is as below: > > > > > > # grub.conf generated by anaconda > > > # > > > # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making > > changes to this > > > file # NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This > means that > > > # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg. > > > # root (hd0,0) > > > # kernel /boot/vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sda1 > > > # initrd /boot/initrd-version.img > > > #boot=/dev/sda > > > default=1 > > > timeout=5 > > > splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz > > > hiddenmenu > > > title CentOS (2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp) > > > root (hd0,0) > > > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp ro > > > root=LABEL=/ > > > initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp.img > > > title CentOS-4 x86_64 (2.6.9-22.EL) > > > root (hd0,0) > > > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-22.EL ro root=LABEL=/ > > > initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-22.EL.img > > > > > > My fstab is as below: > > > > > > # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see ''man fstab-sync'' > > for details > > > LABEL=/ / ext3 > > defaults 1 1 > > > none /dev/pts devpts > > gid=5,mode=620 0 0 > > > none /dev/shm tmpfs > > defaults 0 0 > > > none /proc proc > > defaults 0 0 > > > none /sys sysfs > > defaults 0 0 > > > LABEL=SWAP-sda2 swap swap > > defaults 0 0 > > > /dev/hdb /media/cdrom auto > > > > > pamconsole,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,noauto > > ,managed 0 0 > > > /dev/sdc /media/usbdisk vfat > > > > > > pamconsole,noatime,sync,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,n > > > oauto, > > > managed 0 0 > > > > > > So, I don''t know what''s wrong with my installation? Any > > hints? Thanks > > > in advance! > > > > > > > It perhaps is an issue with the disk labels. > > Try this: > > In grub.conf, change the root=LABEL=/ to the actual device > > (root=/dev/sda1, if sda1 is your root partition) Make the > same change > > in your /etc/fstab. > > Best > > cliffw > > > > > Bests, > > > > > > Su Baochen > > > > > > > > >>-----????----- > > >>???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > > >>[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? > Kumaran Rajaram > > >>????: 2005?12?1? 0:48 > > >>???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > >>??: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: > > >>[Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > > >> > > >>For 2.6.5-7.191, I used the precompiled Lustre kernel. The > > rest were > > >>customized kernels which were patched against Lustre patches. > > >> > > >>-Kums > > >> > > >> > > >>>>>"linuxman" <linuxman@bloghome.cn> 11/30/05 9:25 am >>> > > >> > > >>Thanks Kums, > > >> > > >>And, you use precompiled lustre kernel or your customizied > > kernel, or > > >>compiled from prepatched lustre kernel? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>-----????----- > > >>>???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > > >>>[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? > > Kumaran Rajaram > > >>>????: 2005?12?1? 0:09 > > >>>???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > >>>??: Re: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > > >>> > > >>>Su, > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>So , my question is, anyone have tried lustre 1.4.5 on AMD > > >> > > >>64 platform? > > >> > > >>>Any hints are helpful, and thanks in advance! > > >>> > > >>>We have Lustre 1.4.5 running on AMD 64 platform and have > > tried over > > >>>socknal and openibnal. We use SLES9 distro and kernels > we use are > > >>>2.6.5-7.191, 2.6.12.2, and 2.6.13-15. > > >>> > > >>>HTH, > > >>>-Kums > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>Lustre-discuss mailing list > > >>Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > >>https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > > > Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > > https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
linuxman
2006-May-19 07:36 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms?
Again, I install CentOS 4.2 on AMD Althon 64 3000+ and lustre 1.4.5.95(precomplied lustre kernel), but get below message when boot up failed(copy from the screen): Red Hat nash version 4.2.1.6 starting Mounted /proc filesystem Mounting sysfs Creating /dev Starting udev Loading scsi_mod.ko module SCSI subsystem initialized Loading sd_mod.ko module Loading libata.ko module Loading sata_nv.ko module Loading dm-md.ko module device-mapper: 4.1.0-ioctl(2003-12-10) initialised: dm@uk.sistina.com Loading jbd.ko module Loading ext3.ko.module Creating root device mkrootdev: label / not found Mounting root filesystem mount: error 2 mounting ext3 mount: error 2 mounting none Switching to new root switchroot: mount failed: 22 umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempting to kill init! My grub.conf is as below: # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg. # root (hd0,0) # kernel /boot/vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sda1 # initrd /boot/initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/sda default=1 timeout=5 splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title CentOS (2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp) root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp ro root=LABEL=/ initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp.img title CentOS-4 x86_64 (2.6.9-22.EL) root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-22.EL ro root=LABEL=/ initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-22.EL.img My fstab is as below: # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see ''man fstab-sync'' for details LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1 none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 none /proc proc defaults 0 0 none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0 LABEL=SWAP-sda2 swap swap defaults 0 0 /dev/hdb /media/cdrom auto pamconsole,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 /dev/sdc /media/usbdisk vfat pamconsole,noatime,sync,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,noauto, managed 0 0 So, I don''t know what''s wrong with my installation? Any hints? Thanks in advance! Bests, Su Baochen> -----????----- > ???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > [mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? Kumaran Rajaram > ????: 2005?12?1? 0:48 > ???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > ??: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: > [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > > For 2.6.5-7.191, I used the precompiled Lustre kernel. The > rest were customized kernels which were patched against > Lustre patches. > > -Kums > > >>>"linuxman" <linuxman@bloghome.cn> 11/30/05 9:25 am >>> > Thanks Kums, > > And, you use precompiled lustre kernel or your customizied > kernel, or compiled from prepatched lustre kernel? > > > >-----????----- > >???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > >[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? Kumaran Rajaram > >????: 2005?12?1? 0:09 > >???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > >??: Re: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > > > >Su, > > > > > >So , my question is, anyone have tried lustre 1.4.5 on AMD > 64 platform? > >Any hints are helpful, and thanks in advance! > > > >We have Lustre 1.4.5 running on AMD 64 platform and have tried over > >socknal and openibnal. We use SLES9 distro and kernels we use are > >2.6.5-7.191, 2.6.12.2, and 2.6.13-15. > > > >HTH, > >-Kums > > > > > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > >
cliff white
2006-May-19 07:36 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms?
linuxman wrote:> Again, I install CentOS 4.2 on AMD Althon 64 3000+ and lustre > 1.4.5.95(precomplied lustre kernel), but get below message when boot up > failed(copy from the screen): > > Red Hat nash version 4.2.1.6 starting > Mounted /proc filesystem > Mounting sysfs > Creating /dev > Starting udev > Loading scsi_mod.ko module > SCSI subsystem initialized > Loading sd_mod.ko module > Loading libata.ko module > Loading sata_nv.ko module > Loading dm-md.ko module > device-mapper: 4.1.0-ioctl(2003-12-10) initialised: dm@uk.sistina.com > Loading jbd.ko module > Loading ext3.ko.module > Creating root device > mkrootdev: label / not found > Mounting root filesystem > mount: error 2 mounting ext3 > mount: error 2 mounting none > Switching to new root > switchroot: mount failed: 22 > umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempting to kill init! > > My grub.conf is as below: > > # grub.conf generated by anaconda > # > # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file > # NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This means that > # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg. > # root (hd0,0) > # kernel /boot/vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sda1 > # initrd /boot/initrd-version.img > #boot=/dev/sda > default=1 > timeout=5 > splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz > hiddenmenu > title CentOS (2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp) > root (hd0,0) > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp ro > root=LABEL=/ > initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp.img > title CentOS-4 x86_64 (2.6.9-22.EL) > root (hd0,0) > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-22.EL ro root=LABEL=/ > initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-22.EL.img > > My fstab is as below: > > # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see ''man fstab-sync'' for details > LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1 > none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 > none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0 > none /proc proc defaults 0 0 > none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0 > LABEL=SWAP-sda2 swap swap defaults 0 0 > /dev/hdb /media/cdrom auto > pamconsole,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 > /dev/sdc /media/usbdisk vfat > pamconsole,noatime,sync,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,noauto, > managed 0 0 > > So, I don''t know what''s wrong with my installation? Any hints? Thanks in > advance! >It perhaps is an issue with the disk labels. Try this: In grub.conf, change the root=LABEL=/ to the actual device (root=/dev/sda1, if sda1 is your root partition) Make the same change in your /etc/fstab. Best cliffw> Bests, > > Su Baochen > > >>-----????----- >>???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com >>[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? Kumaran Rajaram >>????: 2005?12?1? 0:48 >>???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com >>??: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: >>[Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? >> >>For 2.6.5-7.191, I used the precompiled Lustre kernel. The >>rest were customized kernels which were patched against >>Lustre patches. >> >>-Kums >> >> >>>>>"linuxman" <linuxman@bloghome.cn> 11/30/05 9:25 am >>> >> >>Thanks Kums, >> >>And, you use precompiled lustre kernel or your customizied >>kernel, or compiled from prepatched lustre kernel? >> >> >> >>>-----????----- >>>???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com >>>[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? Kumaran Rajaram >>>????: 2005?12?1? 0:09 >>>???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com >>>??: Re: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? >>> >>>Su, >>> >>> >>>So , my question is, anyone have tried lustre 1.4.5 on AMD >> >>64 platform? >> >>>Any hints are helpful, and thanks in advance! >>> >>>We have Lustre 1.4.5 running on AMD 64 platform and have tried over >>>socknal and openibnal. We use SLES9 distro and kernels we use are >>>2.6.5-7.191, 2.6.12.2, and 2.6.13-15. >>> >>>HTH, >>>-Kums >>> >> >> >> >>Lustre-discuss mailing list >>Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com >>https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
linuxman
2006-May-19 07:36 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] 答复: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms?
Hi? I have tried CentOS 3.6 x86_64 version(kernel: 2.4.21), Lustre kernel just works fine....> -----????----- > ???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > [mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? linuxman > ????: 2005?12?1? 12:48 > ???: lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > ??: [Lustre-discuss] ??: [Lustre-discuss] ??: > [Lustre-discuss] ??: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] > **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > > Latest news:-) > > I tried on another machine, which is AMD Athlon Sempron > 64(2500+), CentOS > 4.2 x86_64, lustre precompiled kernel just works fine! The > harddisk is the same, sata 80G. > > So, I can conclude that, lustre 1.4.5 can not work on my > Althon 64(socket 939, 3000+), but works on Sempron 64(socket > 754,2500+), I don''t know why.... Any hints? Thanks in advance! > > Maybe something related to the montherboard ? Althon 64 runs > on GA-K8N51GMF-9, and Sempron 64 runs on GA-K8VT800, for your > information. > > Bests, > > Su Baochen > > > -----????----- > > ???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > > [mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? linuxman > > ????: 2005?12?1? 10:15 > > ???: lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > ??: [Lustre-discuss] ??: [Lustre-discuss] ??: > > [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] > does lustre > > work on x86_64 platforms? > > > > Thanks cliffw first! > > > > I have followed your advice and correct the grub.con and > /etc/fstab, > > user > > root=/dev/sda1 instead of LABEL..., but failed either, the error > > message when boot up is: > > > > Mounted /proc filesystem > > Mouting sysfs > > Creating /dev > > Starting udev > > Loading scsi_mod.ko module > > SCSI subsystem initialized > > Loading sd_mod.ko module > > Loading libata.ko module > > Loading sata_nv.ko module > > Loading dm-mod.ko module > > device-mapper:............................. > > Loding jbd.ko module > > Loading ext3.ko module > > Creating root device > > Mounting root filesystem > > mount: error 6 mounting ext3 > > mount: error 2 mounting none > > Switching to new root > > switchroot: mount failed: 22 > > umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 > > Kernel panic............... > > > > So, it seems that root device is created successfully, but > can not be > > mounted. > > > > BTW, I use sata harddisk, so sata_nv is loaded. > > > > Also, I have tried to recompile the prepatched Lustre kernel > > 2.6.9-5.0.5, and compiled ext3 and sata_nv into kernel, but get > > similar error message as > > below: > > > > ====The exact message from screen==> > Mounted /proc filesystem > > Mouting sysfs > > Creating /dev > > Starting udev > > Creating root device > > Mounting root filesystem > > mount: error 6 mounting ext3 > > mount: error 2 mounting none > > Switching to new root > > switchroot: mount failed: 22 > > umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 > > Kernel panic............... > > > > =================================> > > > So, what''s wrong with my installation? Thanks for any help! > > > > bests, > > > > Su Baochen > > > > > > > > > -----????----- > > > ???: cliff white [mailto:cliffw@clusterfs.com] > > > ????: 2005?12?1? 8:51 > > > ???: linuxman > > > ??: lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > > ??: Re: [Lustre-discuss] ??: [Lustre-discuss] Re: > > > [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on > > > x86_64 platforms? > > > > > > linuxman wrote: > > > > Again, I install CentOS 4.2 on AMD Althon 64 3000+ and lustre > > > > 1.4.5.95(precomplied lustre kernel), but get below message > > > when boot > > > > up failed(copy from the screen): > > > > > > > > Red Hat nash version 4.2.1.6 starting Mounted /proc filesystem > > > > Mounting sysfs Creating /dev Starting udev Loading scsi_mod.ko > > > > module SCSI subsystem initialized Loading sd_mod.ko > > module Loading > > > > libata.ko module Loading sata_nv.ko module Loading > dm-md.ko module > > > > device-mapper: 4.1.0-ioctl(2003-12-10) initialised: > > > dm@uk.sistina.com > > > > Loading jbd.ko module Loading ext3.ko.module Creating > root device > > > > mkrootdev: label / not found > > > > Mounting root filesystem > > > > mount: error 2 mounting ext3 > > > > mount: error 2 mounting none > > > > Switching to new root > > > > switchroot: mount failed: 22 > > > > umount /initrd/dev failed: 2 > > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempting to kill init! > > > > > > > > My grub.conf is as below: > > > > > > > > # grub.conf generated by anaconda > > > > # > > > > # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making > > > changes to this > > > > file # NOTICE: You do not have a /boot partition. This > > means that > > > > # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /, eg. > > > > # root (hd0,0) > > > > # kernel /boot/vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/sda1 > > > > # initrd /boot/initrd-version.img > > > > #boot=/dev/sda > > > > default=1 > > > > timeout=5 > > > > splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz > > > > hiddenmenu > > > > title CentOS (2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp) > > > > root (hd0,0) > > > > kernel > /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp ro > > > > root=LABEL=/ > > > > initrd > /boot/initrd-2.6.9-5.0.5.EL_lustre.1.4.5.94smp.img > > > > title CentOS-4 x86_64 (2.6.9-22.EL) > > > > root (hd0,0) > > > > kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.9-22.EL ro root=LABEL=/ > > > > initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.9-22.EL.img > > > > > > > > My fstab is as below: > > > > > > > > # This file is edited by fstab-sync - see ''man fstab-sync'' > > > for details > > > > LABEL=/ / ext3 > > > defaults 1 1 > > > > none /dev/pts devpts > > > gid=5,mode=620 0 0 > > > > none /dev/shm tmpfs > > > defaults 0 0 > > > > none /proc proc > > > defaults 0 0 > > > > none /sys sysfs > > > defaults 0 0 > > > > LABEL=SWAP-sda2 swap swap > > > defaults 0 0 > > > > /dev/hdb /media/cdrom auto > > > > > > > pamconsole,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,noauto > > > ,managed 0 0 > > > > /dev/sdc /media/usbdisk vfat > > > > > > > > > > pamconsole,noatime,sync,fscontext=system_u:object_r:removable_t,exec,n > > > > oauto, > > > > managed 0 0 > > > > > > > > So, I don''t know what''s wrong with my installation? Any > > > hints? Thanks > > > > in advance! > > > > > > > > > > It perhaps is an issue with the disk labels. > > > Try this: > > > In grub.conf, change the root=LABEL=/ to the actual device > > > (root=/dev/sda1, if sda1 is your root partition) Make the > > same change > > > in your /etc/fstab. > > > Best > > > cliffw > > > > > > > Bests, > > > > > > > > Su Baochen > > > > > > > > > > > >>-----????----- > > > >>???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > > > >>[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? > > Kumaran Rajaram > > > >>????: 2005?12?1? 0:48 > > > >>???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > > >>??: [Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: > > > >>[Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > > > >> > > > >>For 2.6.5-7.191, I used the precompiled Lustre kernel. The > > > rest were > > > >>customized kernels which were patched against Lustre patches. > > > >> > > > >>-Kums > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>>>"linuxman" <linuxman@bloghome.cn> 11/30/05 9:25 am >>> > > > >> > > > >>Thanks Kums, > > > >> > > > >>And, you use precompiled lustre kernel or your customizied > > > kernel, or > > > >>compiled from prepatched lustre kernel? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>-----????----- > > > >>>???: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com > > > >>>[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ?? > > > Kumaran Rajaram > > > >>>????: 2005?12?1? 0:09 > > > >>>???: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > > >>>??: Re: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > > > >>> > > > >>>Su, > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>So , my question is, anyone have tried lustre 1.4.5 on AMD > > > >> > > > >>64 platform? > > > >> > > > >>>Any hints are helpful, and thanks in advance! > > > >>> > > > >>>We have Lustre 1.4.5 running on AMD 64 platform and have > > > tried over > > > >>>socknal and openibnal. We use SLES9 distro and kernels > > we use are > > > >>>2.6.5-7.191, 2.6.12.2, and 2.6.13-15. > > > >>> > > > >>>HTH, > > > >>>-Kums > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>Lustre-discuss mailing list > > > >>Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > > >>https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > > > > Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > > > https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > > Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > > https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com > https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
Kumaran Rajaram
2006-May-19 07:36 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Re: [Lustre-discuss] **: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms?
For 2.6.5-7.191, I used the precompiled Lustre kernel. The rest were customized kernels which were patched against Lustre patches. -Kums>>>linuxman <linuxman@bloghome.cn> 11/30/05 9:25 am >>>Thanks Kums, And, you use precompiled lustre kernel or your customizied kernel, or compiled from prepatched lustre kernel?>-----****----- >***: lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com >[mailto:lustre-discuss-admin@lists.clusterfs.com] ** Kumaran Rajaram >****: 2005*12*1* 0:09 >***: linuxman@bloghome.cn; lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com >**: Re: [Lustre-discuss] does lustre work on x86_64 platforms? > >Su, > > >So , my question is, anyone have tried lustre 1.4.5 on AMD 64 >platform? Any hints are helpful, and thanks in advance! > >We have Lustre 1.4.5 running on AMD 64 platform and have >tried over socknal and openibnal. We use SLES9 distro and >kernels we use are 2.6.5-7.191, 2.6.12.2, and 2.6.13-15. > >HTH, >-Kums >Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.clusterfs.com https://lists.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.clusterfs.com/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20051130/b1291715/attachment.html