scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-May-28 08:58 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 12411] Build patchless client packages
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411>From Andreas:It should be possible (and normal for 1.6.x) that a "patchless" client run on a patched server. For clients the biggest part of patched vs patchless is whether the vfs_intent patch is present or not. To be honest, I''d rather have the "patchless" support be determined by whether vfs_intent or vfs_nointent is patched into the kernel instead of "lustre_version.h" (which I think we should keep for the patched servers).
scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Jun-18 19:06 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 12411] Build patchless client packages
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adilger@clusterfs.com Should we actually _remove_ the client patches entirely? If we leave them in, people could still use them by editing the series file, but I''d rather take them out entirely so we don''t need to maintain them. Already, I''ll need to update and reorder some of the client patches if we keep them in. Also, since we plan to stop testing patched clients, I don''t think it''s something we should support.
scjody@clusterfs.com
2007-Jun-19 08:59 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 12411] Build patchless client packages
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12411 (In reply to comment #12)> I think we should remove the vfs patches entirely. We can always get them from > CVS, and if we leave them in the package someone will think they need them.OK.> There are a couple of small patches that might make sense to keep for the > "patchless" clients running on the server kernels, one of them is > export-show_stack.You mean export-show_task? That''s what we use when dumping the stack. I left it in the series since it''s also useful on servers.