deen@clusterfs.com
2007-Jan-20 08:22 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11237] improperly doing page alignment of locks
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Created an attachment (id=9392) Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: --> (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=9392&action=view) Core Lustre part of previous patch. As per Andreas''s suggestion, split initial patch into two parts: lustre core and lnet/klnds.
deen@clusterfs.com
2007-Jan-20 08:23 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11237] improperly doing page alignment of locks
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Created an attachment (id=9393) Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: --> (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=9393&action=view) KLNDS part.
eeb@clusterfs.com
2007-Jan-20 08:45 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11237] improperly doing page alignment of locks
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 I don''t think the changes to the lnds are needed - they are specific to the OS and are entitled to use OS-specific symbols and macros. Also, beware that the same lnet version (b_hd_newconfig) is used with different lustre versions, so you might need to have patches ready for the major lustre version too.
deen@clusterfs.com
2007-Feb-03 19:31 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11237] improperly doing page alignment of locks
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #9392 is|0 |1 obsolete| | Created an attachment (id=9497) Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: --> (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=9497&action=view) Final patch to be committed against b1_5 with latest Andreas'' suggestions.
deen@clusterfs.com
2007-Feb-06 10:08 UTC
[Lustre-devel] [Bug 11237] improperly doing page alignment of locks
Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11237 Created an attachment (id=9528) Please don''t reply to lustre-devel. Instead, comment in Bugzilla by using the following link: --> (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=9528&action=view) Patch against b1_4.