Linux_hpc_swstack - Apr 2008 - Fwd: sata_mv performance; impact of NCQ

I''m forwarding this here - I just posted it to linux-ide.  I
can''t CC
messages to both lists unless this list allows nonsubscriber posting.
I''ll investigate that on Monday but I wanted to get the message out
before the weekend.

Cheers,
Jody

----- Forwarded message from Jody McIntyre <scjody at sun.com> -----

From: Jody McIntyre <scjody at sun.com>
To: linux-ide at vger.kernel.org
Subject: sata_mv performance; impact of NCQ

I have completed several performance tests of the Marvell SATA
controllers (6x MV88SX6081) in a Sun x4500 (Thumper) system.  The
complete results are available from:
http://downloads.lustre.org/people/scjody/thumper-kernel-comparison-01.ods

My ultimate goal is to replace mv_sata (the out-of-tree vendor driver)
on RHEL 4 with sata_mv on a modern kernel, and to do this I need
equivalent or better performance, especially on large (1MB) IOs.

I note the recent changes to enable NCQ result in a net performance gain
for 64K and 128K IOs, but due to a chipset limitation in the 6xxx series
(according to commit f273827e2aadcf2f74a7bdc9ad715a1b20ea7dda),
max_sectors is now limited which means we can no longer perform IOs
greater than 128K (ENOMEM is returned from an sg write.)  Therefore
large IO performance suffers - for example, the performance of 2.6.25
with NCQ support removed on 1MB IOs is better than anything possible
with stock 2.6.25 for many workloads.

Would it be worth re-enabling large IOs on this hardware when NCQ is
disabled (using the queue_depth /proc variable)?  If so I''ll come up
with a patch.

Does anyone know what mv_sata does about NCQ?  I see references to NCQ
throughout the code but I don''t yet understand it enough to determine
what''s going on.  mv_sata _does_ support IOs greater than 128K, which
suggests that it does not use NCQ on this hardware at least.

Any advice on areas to explore to improve sata_mv''s performance?  I
imagine I need to understand what mv_sata does differently, and plan on
spending some time reading that code, but I''d appreciate more specific
ideas if anyone has them.

Details on the tests I performed:

I used the sgpdd-survey tool, a low level performance test from the
Lustre iokit.  It can be downloaded from:
http://downloads.lustre.org/public/tools/lustre-iokit/ .  The tool
performs timed sgp_dd commands using various IO sizes, region counts,
and thread counts and reports aggregate bandwidth.  These results were
then graphed using a spreadsheet.

Note that the largest thread count measured is not the same on all
graphs.  For some reason, write() to the sg device returns ENOMEM to
some sgp_dd threads when large numbers of threads are run on recent
kernels.  The problem does not exist with the RHEL 4 kernel.  I have not
yet investigated why this happens.

Cheers,
Jody

-- 
Jody McIntyre - Linux Kernel Engineer, Sun HPC

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Jody McIntyre - Linux Kernel Engineer, Sun HPC