On Sep 29, 2010, at 17:05 , Hadley Wickham wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Under what license are the R manuals (R language definition etc)
> released? They are not mentioned explicitly in license() and have no
> license information in the individual documents. Does this mean that
> they are released under GPL-2? If so, what does that mean, given that
> they aren't software?
Hmm, well... I have always understood it so that: (a) yes, it's GPL-2 (what
else could it be) and (b) it means that the restrictions of GPL apply insofar as
they make sense, e.g., you can pick it apart and reuse it in other GPL-2 or
compatible products, but not take it proprietary. Upon request, distributors
should probably be prepared to deliver a machine-readable version of the source
code. However, there is no requirement of attribution, as with some of the CC
licenses.
By and large, I think this makes sense for technical documentation files. E.g.,
the help file for poisson.test has stretches of text copied verbatim from
binom.test, and it would be ridiculous if such cross-pollination would require
that Peter, the author of poisson.test should put in a statement that some of
the text was borrowed from binom.test, by Kurt. (In this particular case, both
are (c) R Foundation, but you get the point.)
For more extensive free-standing documents, there might be a point in using a
CC/FDL-style license instead. However, these licenses appear to be GPL
INcompatible, so some care is required. Until now, the GPL plus Common Courtesy
has worked well enough.
>
> Hadley
>
> --
> Assistant Professor / Dobelman Family Junior Chair
> Department of Statistics / Rice University
> http://had.co.nz/
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
--
Peter Dalgaard
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd.mes at cbs.dk Priv: PDalgd at gmail.com