Full_Name: Kevin C. Bartz
Version: 1.5.1
OS: Solaris 2.6
Submission from: (NULL) (192.223.226.5)
A while ago, I noticed this oddity about R profiling and setMethod.
First, I "test out" Rprof.
> require(methods)
Loading required package: methods
[1] TRUE>
> Rprof("test.out")
> data.frame("a")
X.a.
1 a> Rprof(NULL)
So far, so good. Next, I define myClass.
> setClass("myClass", representation(mySlot = "numeric"))
[1] "myClass"> setMethod("as.data.frame", signature(x = "myClass"),
+ function(x, row.names, optional) { "as.data.frame for
myClass" })
Creating a new generic function for "as.data.frame" on
element 1 of the search path
[1] "as.data.frame"
Again, everything is fine. I've expanded as.data.frame to accept objects of
class myClass. Now, let's try the standard data.frame("a") again:
> data.frame("a")
X.a.
1 a
Still, no problems. But after I start R profiling, problems arise:
> Rprof("test2.out")
> data.frame("a")
Error in standardGeneric("as.data.frame") :
UseMethod used in an inappropriate fashion
It seems that I can no longer use the standard method for as.data.frame in an R
profiling sequence once I've defined a new method for it. However, I CAN use
the
standard as.data.frame method when I'm NOT R profiling.
I know I've brought this up before, but I thought it was appropriate also to
log
this bug in a more formal manner.
Thanks,
Kevin
> R.version
_
platform sparc-sun-solaris2.6
arch sparc
os solaris2.6
system sparc, solaris2.6
status
major 1
minor 5.1
year 2002
month 06
day 17
language R
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._