pkg kde talk - Jun 2012 - transition: KDE's 4.8 release of platform, applications and workspace

On Monday 19 March 2012 22:07:22 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> We have a strong suspicion, among other things due to a almost frozen
> kdelibs upstream and due to the various source package splits that has
> happened as part of the 4.7 transition, that the 4.8 transition will be
> a handful of  untangled transitions each involving 3-5 other small
> sourcepackages and a unknown amount of shlibs bumps.
So. The big part of transitioning (kde-workspace) is done-ish now.

A lot of bits have been uploaded to unstable and should migrate by itself. 
Left is:
libmarblewidget (src:marble) having a soname change (~5 source packages 
affected)
some okteta libraries (src: kdesdk) is having a change (kdevelop affected)

a library split from src:kalgebra and also now used by cantor. 

All relevant bits are in NEW curretnly targetting experimental until you say 
''go'' for unstable. We are aware and alert and ready for your
go.


and then there is the splits of kdeaccessibility and kdeutils. Half of it is 
in unstable, and the rest is stuck in NEW targetting unstable and is hopefully 
in soon.

I think that''s around all for now

/Sune
-- 
Man, how can I do for inserting in the hard disk?

You must receive the utility of a parallel driver for telnetting to the CPU 
over the BIOS.

On 20.06.2012 22:44, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> A lot of bits have been uploaded to unstable and should migrate by 
> itself.
> Left is:
> libmarblewidget (src:marble) having a soname change (~5 source 
> packages
> affected)
> some okteta libraries (src: kdesdk) is having a change (kdevelop 
> affected)
>
> a library split from src:kalgebra and also now used by cantor.
>
> All relevant bits are in NEW curretnly targetting experimental until 
> you say
> ''go'' for unstable. We are aware and alert and ready for
your go.
Might have been handy if those had been explicitly mentioned / tracked 
and in NEW earlier.  Ah well.

It looks like marble, cantor and kdesk have now made their way out of 
NEW; analitza hasn''t yet at least.  Have their reverse dependencies
been
{build-,}tested against the new libraries?
> and then there is the splits of kdeaccessibility and kdeutils. Half 
> of it is
> in unstable, and the rest is stuck in NEW targetting unstable and is
> hopefully in soon.
If they''re new packages aiming to get in before freeze then that would 
be handy, yes. :-)

Regards,

Adam

On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> On 20.06.2012 22:44, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > A lot of bits have been uploaded to unstable and should migrate by 
> > itself.
> > Left is:
> > libmarblewidget (src:marble) having a soname change (~5 source 
> > packages
> > affected)
> > some okteta libraries (src: kdesdk) is having a change (kdevelop 
> > affected)
I''ve added a tracker for these at
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/kde4.8bis.html

As discussed on IRC, please feel free to go ahead with unstable uploads
of the packages which originally went to experimental, and let us know
if you need any binNMUs.

Regards,

Adam

Hello and sorry for the late reply,

"Adam D. Barratt" <adam at
adam-barratt.org.uk>
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 20.06.2012 22:44, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > > A lot of bits have been uploaded to unstable and should migrate
by
> > > itself.
> > > Left is:
> > > libmarblewidget (src:marble) having a soname change (~5 source
> > > packages
> > > affected)
> > > some okteta libraries (src: kdesdk) is having a change (kdevelop
> > > affected)
> 
> I''ve added a tracker for these at
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/kde4.8bis.html
> 
> As discussed on IRC, please feel free to go ahead with unstable uploads
> of the packages which originally went to experimental, and let us know
> if you need any binNMUs.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Adam
The recent upload of analitza will not mean doing any binNMU, since the bits 
needing it (src:cantor,src:kalgebra) are going to be uploaded soon, and they 
happen to build depend on the "new" libanalitza-dev (formerly
kalgebra-dev,
note that analitza was split from the old src:kalgebra 4.7.4), so it''s
100%
sure that they will build against the corrrect version.

About the upload of kdesdk (which is going to happen soon), it will need only 
a kdevelop binNMU. It will build without problems with the binNMU, I tested 
it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20120622/f8e50809/attachment.pgp>

On Thursday 21 June 2012 22:35:38 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I''ve added a tracker for these at
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/kde4.8bis.html
Great
 
> As discussed on IRC, please feel free to go ahead with unstable uploads
> of the packages which originally went to experimental, and let us know
> if you need any binNMUs.
''now'' would be good.

KDEsdk is installed across all archs, so a binNMU of kdevelop would be great

marble is built on all archs and installed for all archs except ppc, so a 
binNMU for marble with a depwait on libmarble-dev > 4:4.8 would be great for 
the following packages:
digikam
kdeplasma-addons

I''ve done a sourceful upload of calligra (and bumped the build-dep to
ensure
that the new marble is picked up)

oh. and I think cantor/armel build has been hit by a galactic synchronization 
beam or somethnig like that, so if you could give it back, it would be great.

Hugs
/Sune
-- 
How can I overclock a processor?

The point is that you cannot open the front-end to insert the software.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-kde-talk/attachments/20120622/f1f57616/attachment.pgp>

On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 22:01 +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Thursday 21 June 2012 22:35:38 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> KDEsdk is installed across all archs, so a binNMU of kdevelop would be
great
Scheduled.
> marble is built on all archs and installed for all archs except ppc, so a 
> binNMU for marble with a depwait on libmarble-dev > 4:4.8 would be great
for
> the following packages:
> digikam
> kdeplasma-addons
and those.
> I''ve done a sourceful upload of calligra (and bumped the build-dep
to ensure
> that the new marble is picked up)
okay.
> oh. and I think cantor/armel build has been hit by a galactic
synchronization
> beam or somethnig like that, so if you could give it back, it would be
great.
Done.

Regards,

Adam