On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 10:38:22PM +0200, V?t?zslav Kotrla
wrote:> Cc: mh+pkg-exim4-users at zugschlus.de
Why are you ccing me personally for a new thread? Where do I send the
consulting bill?
> There is one thing in 30_exim4-config_check_rcpt which I''m not
very sure
> of - the final ''accept'':
>
> <quote>
> # At this point, the address has passed all the checks that have been
> # configured, so we accept it unconditionally.
> </quote>
>
> What is rationale behind this approach? In access control lists
I''m used
> to default ''deny'' and then enabling only if policy
criteria are met.
It''s the way upstream does things, and I don''t want to divert
too far
from them when their configuration works. ACLs are a rather new thing
in Exim, and I guess that Philip wanted Exim 4 to work as similiar as
possible to Exim 3.
> Unconditional ''accept'' at the end of ACL chain makes me a
bit uneasy,
> thought it probably has its good reason.
Historical ones, I guess.
> Thanks for your comments.
Please don''t clutter my personal mailbox with support requests that
should be on the mailing list.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don''t trust Computers. They | Mailadresse
im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190