wxruby users - Aug 2004 - Any plans to switch wxruby-swig to using rexml?

since http://nqxml.sourceforge.net/
also recommends that we switch to use rexml which is shipped with ruby?

If there are plans for it but no developers, I might take it up as an 
exercise to learn the internals of wxruby-swig.

Cheers,
Phuah Yee Keat

Phuah Yee Keat wrote:
> since http://nqxml.sourceforge.net/
> also recommends that we switch to use rexml which is shipped with ruby?
> 
> If there are plans for it but no developers, I might take it up as an 
> exercise to learn the internals of wxruby-swig.
I originally tried rexml instead of nqxml, but it was so much slower 
that I don''t know if it ever actually finished.  If you could figure
out
how to make rexml fast enough, that would be perfect. Removing the nqxml 
dependency would be very helpful.

nqxml takes about 2 minutes to parse the xml file on my development 
machine. I think rexml took more than 10 minutes before I gave up and 
stopped it.

Thanks, and thank you for your comments about the wxruby-swig source.

Kevin