Secure testing team - Jan 2009 - php5 packages for lenny, redux

sean finney wrote:
> hi everyone,
Hi
> excuse the cross-posting, i just want to make sure everyone''s on
the
> same page for what should be next for php5 -> lenny
Ok, though I don''t think it''s that controversial :-)
> someone suggested to look at using testing-security as a path to lenny for
> this change since many (but not all) of the fixes are security related
> it feels a little sketchy to me to be honest, so i was hoping for a direct
> ACK/NACK on that from the security/release folks.  particularly, if it does
> go through testing-security, i''d want to know that when lenny
becomes stable
> that the packages are somehow transitioned as well.
I don''t see any reason why it can''t go via testing-security
personally.
Note that currently testing-security uploads reach tpu automatically and
are processed by the Release Team to get it into lenny proper.
> for better review i''ve attached a second diff, which is the result
> of unpacking both versions of package, applying all the quilt patches,
> removing the ".pc" quilt directories, and and doing a diff
between the two
> patched trees (diff -x debian -Nrub lenny1 lenny2).  this should hopefully
> make examining the changes from the quilt patches a little easier.
Thanks, appreciated.
> so please let us know whether this is suitable for either/neither the t-p-u
> route or the testing-security route, and if neither, what needs to be done
> to get something to lenny.
If testing-security is not wanted, t-p-u is fine by me.

Cheers

Luk

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 06:46:18PM +0100, Luk Claes
wrote:
> I don''t see any reason why it can''t go via
testing-security personally.
> Note that currently testing-security uploads reach tpu automatically and
> are processed by the Release Team to get it into lenny proper.
okay, this i didn''t know and it removes my reservations about one being
particularly better than the other.  i was imagining something a bit
messier, hence my initial reluctance.

as a result i''ve just uploaded the previously mentioned version through
testing-security.  thanks!


	sean

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/attachments/20090126/99939795/attachment.pgp

hiya,

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:33:16AM +0100, Nico Golde
wrote:
> It was rejected:
> php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny2_amd64.changes
> REJECT
> Rejected: php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1-1+lenny2.dsc refers to
php5_5.2.6.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz, but I can''t find it in the queue or in
the pool.
> Rejecting.
> 
> Please build with -sa.
i just did another upload.  i guess i don''t get the accept/reject
notifications
for these, so let me know if there''s any more problems.


	sean
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/attachments/20090126/a2b0ed86/attachment.pgp

On moandei 26 Jannewaris 2009, sean finney wrote:
> i just did another upload. ?i guess i don''t get the accept/reject
> notifications for these, so let me know if there''s any more
problems.
It arrived and is building now.


Thijs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/secure-testing-team/attachments/20090127/d2ab2ea4/attachment.pgp