Secure testing commits - Jan 2011 - r15996 - data/CPE

Author: pere
Date: 2011-01-28 08:48:38 +0000 (Fri, 28 Jan 2011)
New Revision: 15996

Added:
   data/CPE/aliases
Log:
Start on a list of suspected aliases in CPE land.

Added: data/CPE/aliases
==================================================================---
data/CPE/aliases	                        (rev 0)
+++ data/CPE/aliases	2011-01-28 08:48:38 UTC (rev 15996)
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+#
+# Collection of CPE aliases, ie different CPE entries refering to the
+# same entity.  Each of these should probably be cleaned up in the CPE
+# dictionary and each NVD entry.
+#
+cpe:/a:asterisk:asterisk
+cpe:/a:asterisk:open_source
+cpe:/a:asterisk:p_b_x
+cpe:/a:digium:asterisk
+
+cpe:/a:cclamav:clamav
+cpe:/a:clam_anti-virus:clamav
+cpe:/a:clamav:clamav
+cpe:/a:clamavs:clamav
+
+cpe:/a:kernel:linux_kernel
+cpe:/a:linux:kernel
+cpe:/o:kernel:linux
+cpe:/o:linux:kernel
+cpe:/o:linux:linux_kernel
+
+cpe:/a:eric_raymond:fetchmail
+cpe:/a:fetchmail:fetchmail
+
+cpe:/a:x:x.org
+cpe:/a:x:x11
+
+cpe:/a:anibal_monsalve_salaz:ssmtp
+cpe:/a:ssmtp:ssmtp
+
+cpe:/a:silc:silc_toolkit
+cpe:/a:silcnet:silc_toolkit
+
+cpe:/a:icdevgroup:interchange
+cpe:/a:interchange_development_group:interchange
+
+cpe:/a:w3:amaya
+cpe:/a:w3c:amaya_web_browser
+
+cpe:/a:python:python
+cpe:/a:python_software_foundation:python
+
+cpe:/a:sixapart:movable_type
+cpe:/a:sixapart:movabletype
+
+cpe:/a:apple:cups
+cpe:/a:cups:cups
+
+cpe:/a:foolabs:xpdf
+cpe:/a:xpdf:xpdf
+
+cpe:/a:citrix:xen
+cpe:/a:xen:xen
+cpe:/a:xensource:xen
+cpe:/a:xensource_inc:xen
+
+cpe:/a:videolan:vlc
+cpe:/a:videolan:vlc_media_player

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:48:41 +0000, Petter Reinholdtsen
wrote:
> Author: pere
> Date: 2011-01-28 08:48:38 +0000 (Fri, 28 Jan 2011)
> New Revision: 15996
> 
> Added:
>    data/CPE/aliases
> Log:
> Start on a list of suspected aliases in CPE land.
Wouldn''t it be easier to use multiple entries (for all of the known
aliases) in the existing CPE list?  It doesn''t seem necessary to start
a new list.

Best wishes,
Mike

[Michael Gilbert]
> Wouldn''t it be easier to use multiple entries (for all of the
known
> aliases) in the existing CPE list?  It doesn''t seem necessary to
> start a new list.
Perhaps.  I split it out to make it more visible that there might be
duplicate CPEs, and to make it easier to pass it to whoever can get
merge these duplicate entries.

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen