Patches: 1) Sizer.rbw: Selects first item after creating the list 2) wxCalendarCtrl.rbw: Uses ruby DateTime now 3) wxButton.rbw: There is no function ''set_tool_tip_string''. Changed to set_tool_tip 4) wxCheckBox.rbw: Missing quote on require. cID was too big, caused assert failure 5) wxCheckListBox.rbw: Missing argument to StaticText.new added (I don''t /think/ it''s supposed to work without that argument) There are some .i and .h patches that I didn''t have time to put together and deserve their own e-mail. Roy _______________________________________________ wxruby-users mailing list wxruby-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users
Roy Sutton wrote:> Patches: > > 1) Sizer.rbw: Selects first item after creating the list > 2) wxCalendarCtrl.rbw: Uses ruby DateTime now > 3) wxButton.rbw: There is no function ''set_tool_tip_string''. Changed > to set_tool_tip > 4) wxCheckBox.rbw: Missing quote on require. cID was too big, caused > assert failureThese patches are still failing for me (or at least the first one I tried was). I applied them all manually, with one change: Changing the ID from 5000 to ID_HIGHEST + 1 to avoid conflicting with a wx-assigned ID. Those parts of bigdemo do work for me now. I did just realize that I can only adjust the right-side splitter upward, not downward. Seems weird. Is that happening for you too?> 5) wxCheckListBox.rbw: Missing argument to StaticText.new added (I > don''t /think/ it''s supposed to work without that argument)This one wasn''t included, but it''s the same problem I found on my own before looking at this email. No need to resend.> There are some .i and .h patches that I didn''t have time to put together > and deserve their own e-mail.Excellent. I''m really happy with the way things are going right now! Kevin
I wonder why patches for .i and .h files apply just fine but patches to .rb/rbw files fail? Could it be that CVS isn''t treating .rb and .rbw as text files? Are the other files having line endings converted but the .rb and .rbw files aren''t? Kevin Smith wrote:> These patches are still failing for me (or at least the first one I > tried was).
Roy Sutton wrote:> I wonder why patches for .i and .h files apply just fine but patches to > .rb/rbw files fail? Could it be that CVS isn''t treating .rb and .rbw as > text files? Are the other files having line endings converted but the > .rb and .rbw files aren''t?I''m pretty sure your patches to .rb files in other directories work fine. I think there''s something weird about bigdemo itself. Some of the patch failures seem to be caused by the line numbers being off by one (or two or three). Others I can''t explain. I do have to confess that I only tried patch on one of the last four patches you sent, but I have never yet had one of your bigdemo patches work for me. Kevin