> From: "Jens Oehlschlägel-Akiyoshi"
<jens.oehlschlaegel-akiyoshi@mdfactory.de>
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 16:56:36 +0100
>
> In RW0901 I could
>
> > dates("01/01/2000")
> [1] 01/01/100
>
> where only the printing was wrong, but the double numeric representation of
> the chron object was calculated correctly
>
> but now in RW0990
The difference is not in rw0901/rw0990 but in the version of chron
in use. There is an rw0901 version of chron 2.2-2 too.
> > dates("01/01/2000")
> Error in fun(yy, ...) : must be 2-digit (numeric) year specification
>
> and also the followig doesn't help
>
> > dates("01/01/2000", format="dd/mm/yyyy")
> Error in names<-.default(*tmp*, value = fnames) :
> names attribute must be the same length as the vector
> In addition: Warning message:
> wrong number of fields in entry(ies) 1 in: unpaste(dates., sep = fmt$sep,
> fnames = fmt$periods, nfields = 3)
>
> Shall I send a bug report or is this a known problem?
That happens for me on Unix. If there is not already a bug report, send one.
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._