On Thu Apr 14 01:10:34 CEST 2005, jadz@toybox.fyremoon.net wrote:
> box1# ping site-2-vpn
> PING site-2-vpn (10.0.1.1): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=197.731 ms
> 64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=203.417 ms
> 64 bytes from 10.0.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=203.556 ms
[...]> TCPOnly = yes
Aha. It could be because of TCPOnly, if the Nagle algorithm is still in
effect. What about throughput? Is that also much lower via the VPN than
via a direct connection or is it comparable?
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.eu.org>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://brouwer.uvt.nl/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20050414/f30c39cb/attachment.pgp