Linux Virtualization - Feb 2011 - [PATCH] Staging: hv: Use list_entry for msg_info and remove associated comment

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:35:37AM -0800, Hank Janssen
wrote:
> Change code to use list_entry api. And removed comment
> suggesting that change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: K.Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c |   17 +++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c
b/drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> index a9c9d49..6c497e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c
> @@ -580,8 +580,9 @@ static void vmbus_onopen_result(struct
vmbus_channel_message_header *hdr)
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&vmbus_connection.channelmsg_lock, flags);
>  
>  	list_for_each(curr, &vmbus_connection.chn_msg_list) {
> -/* FIXME: this should probably use list_entry() instead */
> -		msginfo = (struct vmbus_channel_msginfo *)curr;
> +		msginfo = list_entry(curr, struct vmbus_channel_msginfo,
> +				msglistentry);
How about using list_for_each_entry() instead?  That's the
"preferred"
way to do things these days, and it saves you an extra line of code :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Change code to use list_entry api. And removed comment
suggesting that change.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kane <v-abkane at microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: K.Y. Srinivasan <kys at microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen at microsoft.com>

---
 drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c |   17 +++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c
b/drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c
index a9c9d49..6c497e9 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/hv/channel_mgmt.c
@@ -580,8 +580,9 @@ static void vmbus_onopen_result(struct
vmbus_channel_message_header *hdr)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vmbus_connection.channelmsg_lock, flags);
 
 	list_for_each(curr, &vmbus_connection.chn_msg_list) {
-/* FIXME: this should probably use list_entry() instead */
-		msginfo = (struct vmbus_channel_msginfo *)curr;
+		msginfo = list_entry(curr, struct vmbus_channel_msginfo,
+				msglistentry);
+
 		requestheader  			(struct vmbus_channel_message_header *)msginfo->msg;
 
@@ -628,8 +629,8 @@ static void vmbus_ongpadl_created(struct
vmbus_channel_message_header *hdr)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vmbus_connection.channelmsg_lock, flags);
 
 	list_for_each(curr, &vmbus_connection.chn_msg_list) {
-/* FIXME: this should probably use list_entry() instead */
-		msginfo = (struct vmbus_channel_msginfo *)curr;
+		msginfo = list_entry(curr, struct vmbus_channel_msginfo,
+				msglistentry);
 		requestheader  			(struct vmbus_channel_message_header *)msginfo->msg;
 
@@ -676,8 +677,8 @@ static void vmbus_ongpadl_torndown(
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vmbus_connection.channelmsg_lock, flags);
 
 	list_for_each(curr, &vmbus_connection.chn_msg_list) {
-/* FIXME: this should probably use list_entry() instead */
-		msginfo = (struct vmbus_channel_msginfo *)curr;
+		msginfo = list_entry(curr, struct vmbus_channel_msginfo,
+				msglistentry);
 		requestheader  			(struct vmbus_channel_message_header *)msginfo->msg;
 
@@ -718,8 +719,8 @@ static void vmbus_onversion_response(
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vmbus_connection.channelmsg_lock, flags);
 
 	list_for_each(curr, &vmbus_connection.chn_msg_list) {
-/* FIXME: this should probably use list_entry() instead */
-		msginfo = (struct vmbus_channel_msginfo *)curr;
+		msginfo = list_entry(curr, struct vmbus_channel_msginfo,
+				msglistentry);
 		requestheader  			(struct vmbus_channel_message_header *)msginfo->msg;
 
-- 
1.6.0.2