Hello, can you please update ruby-opengl for the next OCI release ? I''ve created package with the binaries and samples for version 0.50.0, and patch against current svn of rubyinstaller is attached to this mail. From usage and API point of view the 0.50.0 release should be 100% backwards compatible with the original Yoshi''s 0.2x/0.3x bindings, the only difference is that 0.2x installs files ''opengl.so'' and ''glut.so'', while we use ''gl.so'', ''glu.so'', ''glut.so'' and also ''opengl.rb'' for backwards compatibility. Thanks, Jan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: oci-ruby-opengl-0.50.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubyinstaller-devel/attachments/20071024/474c9ea6/attachment.bin
On 10/23/07, Jan Dvorak <jan.dvorak at kraxnet.cz> wrote:> Hello, > > can you please update ruby-opengl for the next OCI release ? I''ve created > package with the binaries and samples for version 0.50.0, and patch against > current svn of rubyinstaller is attached to this mail. > > From usage and API point of view the 0.50.0 release should be 100% backwards > compatible with the original Yoshi''s 0.2x/0.3x bindings, the only difference > is that 0.2x installs files ''opengl.so'' and ''glut.so'', while we > use ''gl.so'', ''glu.so'', ''glut.so'' and also ''opengl.rb'' for backwards > compatibility. >Thank you Jan I''ll review this tomorrow morning and post here the results. Regards, Luis -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi
On 10/23/07, Luis Lavena <luislavena at gmail.com> wrote:> On 10/23/07, Jan Dvorak <jan.dvorak at kraxnet.cz> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > can you please update ruby-opengl for the next OCI release ? I''ve created > > package with the binaries and samples for version 0.50.0, and patch against > > current svn of rubyinstaller is attached to this mail. > > > > From usage and API point of view the 0.50.0 release should be 100% backwards > > compatible with the original Yoshi''s 0.2x/0.3x bindings, the only difference > > is that 0.2x installs files ''opengl.so'' and ''glut.so'', while we > > use ''gl.so'', ''glu.so'', ''glut.so'' and also ''opengl.rb'' for backwards > > compatibility. > > > > Thank you Jan > > I''ll review this tomorrow morning and post here the results. >Jan, sorry the delay on answering you. It seems the binary files you provide from the ruby-opengl site bundled in the zip listed in the patch are broken (is not a valid Win32 image). Maybe those are the linux ones? (found the ELF header instead of the WinPE one). Let me know so we could ship another RC after this. -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi
On Monday 29 October 2007 21:34, Luis Lavena wrote:> Jan, sorry the delay on answering you. > > It seems the binary files you provide from the ruby-opengl site > bundled in the zip listed in the patch are broken (is not a valid > Win32 image). > > Maybe those are the linux ones? (found the ELF header instead of the WinPE > one). > > Let me know so we could ship another RC after this.Aww, sorry about that. I''ve now replaced the file on web with the proper binaries. Speaking of that, perhaps it would be better to instead use the win32 binary gem directly from repository, but i''m not sure if i understand the OCI build scripts enough to make a patch. Thanks, Jan
On 10/29/07, Jan Dvorak <jan.dvorak at kraxnet.cz> wrote:> On Monday 29 October 2007 21:34, Luis Lavena wrote: > > Jan, sorry the delay on answering you. > > > > It seems the binary files you provide from the ruby-opengl site > > bundled in the zip listed in the patch are broken (is not a valid > > Win32 image). > > > > Maybe those are the linux ones? (found the ELF header instead of the WinPE > > one). > > > > Let me know so we could ship another RC after this. > > Aww, sorry about that. I''ve now replaced the file on web with the proper > binaries. >Thanks, I''ll test it later.> Speaking of that, perhaps it would be better to instead use the win32 binary > gem directly from repository, but i''m not sure if i understand the OCI build > scripts enough to make a patch. >Oh, you have a pre-packaged gem? what compiler did you use? (since we are striclty using VC6 for all the builds). You can contact me online (gtalk) or #mongrel / #mongrel-dev at irc (where I usually hang). -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi
On Monday 29 October 2007 22:26, Luis Lavena wrote:> > Speaking of that, perhaps it would be better to instead use the win32 > > binary gem directly from repository, but i''m not sure if i understand the > > OCI build scripts enough to make a patch. > > Oh, you have a pre-packaged gem? what compiler did you use? (since we > are striclty using VC6 for all the builds).VC6 as well, if fact the only reason i use VC6 is to build the bindings to be compatible with OCI :) (fortunately the company i work for had some spare VC6 licenses).> You can contact me online (gtalk) or #mongrel / #mongrel-dev at irc > (where I usually hang).I''ll do Thanks, Jan
On 10/29/07, Jan Dvorak <jan.dvorak at kraxnet.cz> wrote:> On Monday 29 October 2007 22:26, Luis Lavena wrote: > > > Speaking of that, perhaps it would be better to instead use the win32 > > > binary gem directly from repository, but i''m not sure if i understand the > > > OCI build scripts enough to make a patch. > > > > Oh, you have a pre-packaged gem? what compiler did you use? (since we > > are striclty using VC6 for all the builds). > VC6 as well, if fact the only reason i use VC6 is to build the bindings to be > compatible with OCI :) (fortunately the company i work for had some spare VC6 > licenses). >Hope you don''t missed the previous mails about the possible version switch for next RubyInstaller. Still lot of points (good and bad) should be taked in consideration to take the final decision. Regards, -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi