I''ve been doing daily pushes, but I forgot to send the emails. Sorry about that. I''ve just pushed a new Git Revision. Enjoy JD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090122/1957b316/attachment-0001.html>
Now that github is the primary external repo, how about those of us who are really interested (like me ;)) just subscribe to the rss feed? http://github.com/feeds/ironruby/commits/ironruby/master On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jim Deville <jdeville at microsoft.com> wrote:> I''ve been doing daily pushes, but I forgot to send the emails. Sorry > about that. I''ve just pushed a new Git Revision. > > > > Enjoy > > > > JD > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >-- Michael Letterle [Polymath Prokrammer] http://blog.prokrams.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090122/ce7bcea2/attachment.html>
What, you don''t like my emails? From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Michael Letterle Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:48 PM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Git push Now that github is the primary external repo, how about those of us who are really interested (like me ;)) just subscribe to the rss feed? http://github.com/feeds/ironruby/commits/ironruby/master On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Jim Deville <jdeville at microsoft.com<mailto:jdeville at microsoft.com>> wrote: I''ve been doing daily pushes, but I forgot to send the emails. Sorry about that. I''ve just pushed a new Git Revision. Enjoy JD _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core -- Michael Letterle [Polymath Prokrammer] http://blog.prokrams.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090122/ab0fbd0d/attachment.html>
As you may have seen via the RSS feed, I have pushed a new IronRuby revision out. This still requires the MERLIN_ROOT variable and the CSPROJ has load issues due to SpecSharp.targets, but both of those are being phased out. I''m waiting on a code review for the shelveset that will get rid of MERLIN_ROOT checking, and I''m working on the changes for SpecSharp. Enjoy! JD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090127/4f89b08d/attachment.html>
Looking at it now ... =P From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jim Deville Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 2:57 PM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: [Ironruby-core] Git push As you may have seen via the RSS feed, I have pushed a new IronRuby revision out. This still requires the MERLIN_ROOT variable and the CSPROJ has load issues due to SpecSharp.targets, but both of those are being phased out. I''m waiting on a code review for the shelveset that will get rid of MERLIN_ROOT checking, and I''m working on the changes for SpecSharp. Enjoy! JD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090127/89f182fb/attachment.html>
Sorry for missing the past couple of days, but I have finally pushed a new revision to Github. As of this change (1ee05cdd), MERLIN_ROOT is no longer required. You can now download it, get into a VS Command prompt, and run rake compile from Merlin/Main/Languages/Ruby. Let me know if you have problems. Enjoy! JD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090130/de146a87/attachment.html>
The goalposts just got moved... http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/30/ruby-1-9-1-released/ Apologies if this is old news. This begs the question, is IronRuby eventually going to target 1.9? Any ideas on when or if this might happen?
Build is currently broken and it appears that MERLIN_ROOT is still required? On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jim Deville <jdeville at microsoft.com> wrote:> Sorry for missing the past couple of days, but I have finally pushed a > new revision to Github. As of this change (1ee05cdd), MERLIN_ROOT is no > longer required. You can now download it, get into a VS Command prompt, and > run rake compile from Merlin/Main/Languages/Ruby. Let me know if you have > problems. > > > > Enjoy! > > JD > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >-- Michael Letterle IronRuby MVP http://blog.prokrams.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090203/faab066a/attachment.html>
FWIW, the major issue seems to be Merlin/Main/Runtime/Microsoft.Scripting/Microsoft.Scripting.Build.csproj not including Runtime\BindingRestrictionsHelpers.cs On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Michael Letterle <michael.letterle at gmail.com> wrote:> Build is currently broken and it appears that MERLIN_ROOT is still > required? > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jim Deville <jdeville at microsoft.com>wrote: > >> Sorry for missing the past couple of days, but I have finally pushed a >> new revision to Github. As of this change (1ee05cdd), MERLIN_ROOT is no >> longer required. You can now download it, get into a VS Command prompt, and >> run rake compile from Merlin/Main/Languages/Ruby. Let me know if you have >> problems. >> >> >> >> Enjoy! >> >> JD >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ironruby-core mailing list >> Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core >> >> > > > -- > Michael Letterle > IronRuby MVP > http://blog.prokrams.com > > >-- Michael Letterle IronRuby MVP http://blog.prokrams.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090203/6316aa1b/attachment.html>
I just pushed again, fixing this error. I tested before I did the merge to master, and apparently that merge got messed up. I have tested this version before pushing. JD From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Michael Letterle Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:25 PM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Git push FWIW, the major issue seems to be Merlin/Main/Runtime/Microsoft.Scripting/Microsoft.Scripting.Build.csproj not including Runtime\BindingRestrictionsHelpers.cs On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Michael Letterle <michael.letterle at gmail.com<mailto:michael.letterle at gmail.com>> wrote: Build is currently broken and it appears that MERLIN_ROOT is still required? On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jim Deville <jdeville at microsoft.com<mailto:jdeville at microsoft.com>> wrote: Sorry for missing the past couple of days, but I have finally pushed a new revision to Github. As of this change (1ee05cdd), MERLIN_ROOT is no longer required. You can now download it, get into a VS Command prompt, and run rake compile from Merlin/Main/Languages/Ruby. Let me know if you have problems. Enjoy! JD _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core -- Michael Letterle IronRuby MVP http://blog.prokrams.com -- Michael Letterle IronRuby MVP http://blog.prokrams.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090203/f36cf010/attachment-0001.html>
Don''t worry everyone, I''ll make a I-Broke-The-Build hat and make Jim wear it all day tomorrow. =) That''s if I remember ... which is unlikely. From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jim Deville Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:47 PM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Git push I just pushed again, fixing this error. I tested before I did the merge to master, and apparently that merge got messed up. I have tested this version before pushing. JD From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Michael Letterle Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:25 PM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Git push FWIW, the major issue seems to be Merlin/Main/Runtime/Microsoft.Scripting/Microsoft.Scripting.Build.csproj not including Runtime\BindingRestrictionsHelpers.cs On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Michael Letterle <michael.letterle at gmail.com<mailto:michael.letterle at gmail.com>> wrote: Build is currently broken and it appears that MERLIN_ROOT is still required? On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jim Deville <jdeville at microsoft.com<mailto:jdeville at microsoft.com>> wrote: Sorry for missing the past couple of days, but I have finally pushed a new revision to Github. As of this change (1ee05cdd), MERLIN_ROOT is no longer required. You can now download it, get into a VS Command prompt, and run rake compile from Merlin/Main/Languages/Ruby. Let me know if you have problems. Enjoy! JD _______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core -- Michael Letterle IronRuby MVP http://blog.prokrams.com -- Michael Letterle IronRuby MVP http://blog.prokrams.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090203/5cc6761b/attachment.html>
IronRuby is targeting 1.8.6 compatibility (modulo continuations) with Ruby on Windows first. There are some Ruby 1.9 features which we have designed IronRuby to support in future versions. This will eventually happen, but 1.8.6 compat will need to happen first.> -----Original Message----- > From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core- > bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:52 PM > To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > Subject: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released > > The goalposts just got moved... > > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/30/ruby-1-9-1-released/ > > Apologies if this is old news. > > This begs the question, is IronRuby eventually going to target 1.9? > Any ideas on when or if this might happen? > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
What are "modulo continuations"? I''ve never heard that term. I''ve done very little ruby work but am interested in the topic. I did a quick google and only things related to iron ruby came back when I entered modulo continuations. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jimmy Schementi < Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com> wrote:> IronRuby is targeting 1.8.6 compatibility (modulo continuations) with Ruby > on Windows first. There are some Ruby 1.9 features which we have designed > IronRuby to support in future versions. This will eventually happen, but > 1.8.6 compat will need to happen first. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core- > > bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards > > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:52 PM > > To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > > Subject: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released > > > > The goalposts just got moved... > > > > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/30/ruby-1-9-1-released/ > > > > Apologies if this is old news. > > > > This begs the question, is IronRuby eventually going to target 1.9? > > Any ideas on when or if this might happen? > > _______________________________________________ > > Ironruby-core mailing list > > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090204/6a0ee584/attachment-0001.html>
"modulo" in this sense means "excluding" -- that we''re not considering the item. Continuations are described at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuation. Implementing continuations on top of the CLR would be pretty challenging, and (as I understand it) they''re not widely used in the Ruby community. From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Stott Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:41 PM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released What are "modulo continuations"? I''ve never heard that term. I''ve done very little ruby work but am interested in the topic. I did a quick google and only things related to iron ruby came back when I entered modulo continuations. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jimmy Schementi <Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com<mailto:Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com>> wrote: IronRuby is targeting 1.8.6 compatibility (modulo continuations) with Ruby on Windows first. There are some Ruby 1.9 features which we have designed IronRuby to support in future versions. This will eventually happen, but 1.8.6 compat will need to happen first.> -----Original Message----- > From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org> [mailto:ironruby-core-<mailto:ironruby-core-> > bounces at rubyforge.org<mailto:bounces at rubyforge.org>] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:52 PM > To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core at rubyforge.org> > Subject: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released > > The goalposts just got moved... > > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/30/ruby-1-9-1-released/ > > Apologies if this is old news. > > This begs the question, is IronRuby eventually going to target 1.9? > Any ideas on when or if this might happen? > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090204/bc27a596/attachment.html>
IronRuby targets 1.8.6, except for continuations. We also will have optional support for ObjectSpace. JD From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Stott Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:41 PM To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released What are "modulo continuations"? I''ve never heard that term. I''ve done very little ruby work but am interested in the topic. I did a quick google and only things related to iron ruby came back when I entered modulo continuations. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jimmy Schementi <Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com<mailto:Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com>> wrote: IronRuby is targeting 1.8.6 compatibility (modulo continuations) with Ruby on Windows first. There are some Ruby 1.9 features which we have designed IronRuby to support in future versions. This will eventually happen, but 1.8.6 compat will need to happen first.> -----Original Message----- > From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org> [mailto:ironruby-core-<mailto:ironruby-core-> > bounces at rubyforge.org<mailto:bounces at rubyforge.org>] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:52 PM > To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:ironruby-core at rubyforge.org> > Subject: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released > > The goalposts just got moved... > > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/30/ruby-1-9-1-released/ > > Apologies if this is old news. > > This begs the question, is IronRuby eventually going to target 1.9? > Any ideas on when or if this might happen? > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core_______________________________________________ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org<mailto:Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090204/9e244245/attachment-0001.html>
Hah, I''ve never heard modulo used in any sense except "1 % 6". Learn something new everyday. Thanks guys. On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Curt Hagenlocher <curth at microsoft.com>wrote:> "modulo" in this sense means "excluding" -- that we''re not considering > the item. Continuations are described at > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuation. Implementing continuations on > top of the CLR would be pretty challenging, and (as I understand it) they''re > not widely used in the Ruby community. > > > > *From:* ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto: > ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Nathan Stott > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 04, 2009 6:41 PM > *To:* ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > *Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released > > > > What are "modulo continuations"? I''ve never heard that term. I''ve done > very little ruby work but am interested in the topic. I did a quick google > and only things related to iron ruby came back when I entered modulo > continuations. > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jimmy Schementi < > Jimmy.Schementi at microsoft.com> wrote: > > IronRuby is targeting 1.8.6 compatibility (modulo continuations) with Ruby > on Windows first. There are some Ruby 1.9 features which we have designed > IronRuby to support in future versions. This will eventually happen, but > 1.8.6 compat will need to happen first. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ironruby-core-bounces at rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core- > > bounces at rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards > > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 3:52 PM > > To: ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > > Subject: [Ironruby-core] Ruby 1.9.1 stable released > > > > The goalposts just got moved... > > > > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2009/01/30/ruby-1-9-1-released/ > > > > Apologies if this is old news. > > > > This begs the question, is IronRuby eventually going to target 1.9? > > Any ideas on when or if this might happen? > > _______________________________________________ > > Ironruby-core mailing list > > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ironruby-core mailing list > Ironruby-core at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090205/cfc843e6/attachment.html>
I have pushed TFS to Git. Just an FYI, the building where the IronRuby team is located is having a building move the rest of the week. In addition, TFS is undergoing upgrades during that time. Due to all of this, I won''t push again until Monday. JD -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/attachments/20090211/43d31c73/attachment.html>