Net ssh users - Jan 2005 - Getting the FQDN on Windows (was: Test

Hi again,
> I''m glad it fixed a few things, anyway. If you make a similar
> change to tc_socks4.rb and tc_socks5.rb more of the errors
> will go away.
Ok, I did that.  Now we''re down to just this:

C:\ruby\src\net-ssh-0.9.0\test>ruby ALL-TESTS.rb
Loaded suite ALL-TESTS
Started
........................................................................
..EF....
........................................................................
........
........................................................................
........
.............E................................................
Finished in 1.161 seconds.

  1) Error:
test_local_with_3(TC_Forward_Driver):
Errno::ENOTCONN: A request to send or receive data was disallowed
because the so
cket is not connected and (when sending on a datagram socket using a
sendto call
) no address was supplied.
    ../lib/net/ssh/service/forward/driver.rb:251:in `shutdown''
    ../lib/net/ssh/service/forward/driver.rb:251:in `cancel_local''
    ./service/forward/tc_driver.rb:142:in `test_local_with_3''
    ./service/forward/tc_driver.rb:125:in `test_local_with_3''

  2) Failure:
test_local_with_4(TC_Forward_Driver)
    [./service/forward/tc_driver.rb:139:in `test_local_with_4''
     ./service/forward/tc_driver.rb:125:in `test_local_with_4'']:
<1> expected but was
<0>.

  3) Error:
test_on_open(TC_RemoteNetworkHandler):
Errno::ENOTCONN: A request to send or receive data was disallowed
because the so
cket is not connected and (when sending on a datagram socket using a
sendto call
) no address was supplied.
    ./service/forward/tc_remote_network_handler.rb:74:in `shutdown''
    ./service/forward/tc_remote_network_handler.rb:79:in `join''
    ./service/forward/tc_remote_network_handler.rb:79:in `join''
    ./service/forward/tc_remote_network_handler.rb:101:in
`test_on_open''

302 tests, 706 assertions, 1 failures, 2 errors

HTH.

Regards,

Dan

PS - It looks like there''s a typo in the error message itself -
"so
cket" vs "socket".

On 12:05 Wed 12 Jan     , Berger, Daniel wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> > I''m glad it fixed a few things, anyway. If you make a similar
> > change to tc_socks4.rb and tc_socks5.rb more of the errors
> > will go away.
>
> Ok, I did that.  Now we''re down to just this:
[snip]

Thanks, Dan. That''s much more encouraging than the last run. :)
I''ll
try and take some time this week to hunt down the remaining failures.

- Jamis

--
Jamis Buck
jamis_buck@byu.edu
http://www.jamisbuck.org/jamis
------------------------------
"I am Victor of Borge. You will be assimil-nine-ed."