On a similar note I'm actually quite concerned by the inclusion of
these patches by default in the OS version of ssh as we've seen
several cases of it causing noticeable performance degradation
instead of improvement.
I've not tested on 9, but this was certainly the case on 8.2.
Regards
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" <jeremiah.gowdy@freedomvoice.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2012 5:30 PM
Subject: HPN-SSH question
Since it doesn't seem that the HPN-SSH patches are going to be merged
upstream to OpenSSH (please correct me if I'm wrong), and
since the HPN-SSH project seems to be very low on resources, is the inclusion of
these patches in FreeBSD 9 a commitment by
FreeBSD to maintain these patches against stock OpenSSH in the future? Is there
any indication that the OpenSSH project will be
more willing to consider merging if the patches survive a -STABLE generation in
FreeBSD?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
===============================================This e.mail is private and
confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is
addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using,
copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in
it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please
telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.