freebsd stable - Oct 2011 - nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) 8129 testers wanted [Re: Question about GPIO bitbang MII]

Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
for 9/head:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff
for 8:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff8

Thanks,
Marius

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 02:46:23AM +0200, Damien Fleuriot
wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
> > rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the
following
> > patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
> > for 9/head:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff
> > for 8:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff8
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Marius
> > 
> 
> 
> While I don't have any box with this hardware, I'm thinking you
might want to get a bit more specific about what you want tested...
> 
> What do you think the patch might break ?
> 
Basically, if there's something wrong with the patch the driver should
fail to attach, if it still does and gets a link all should be fine.

Marius

On 15 Oct 2011, at 22:56, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> wrote:
> 
> Could owners of nge(4), tl(4), wb(4) and rl(4) driven hardware (as for
> rl(4) only 8129 need testing, 8139 don't) please give the following
> patch a try in order to ensure it doesn't break anything?
> for 9/head:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff
> for 8:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/mii_bitbang.diff8
> 
> Thanks,
> Marius
> 

While I don't have any box with this hardware, I'm thinking you might
want to get a bit more specific about what you want tested...

What do you think the patch might break ?