On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 21:16, Rob wrote:> With 5.3 it has become much easier to add swap as a regular file,
> remove it later, or add a bigger or smaller one instead.
>
> The swap partition always causes me little headache: once the
> size is choosen at partitioning during install, it's fixed.
> I can't size it up or down anymore, unless I go fiddling with
> the partition table, which I desperately like to avoid.
>
> So, why not using swapfile without swap partition at all.
> Have it on a big partition with lots of space. If there's a
> problem with the space, I can easily move the swap elsewhere.
> A swapfile is so much more flexible.
>
> Is there a downside of not using swap partition, and have only
> swapfile instead?
You can't save crash dumps, and it is less efficient.
In general you don't need much swap if you have a reasonable amount of RAM,
so
it's not usually necessary to resize your swap when you get more RAM (unless
you want to save crashdumps..)
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
-- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20041107/77edfbb3/attachment.bin