Hi all, I''ve just been having some fun converting some schema''s from our existing openldap schema to FDS :-) A couple of things have been thrown up, that I have listed below (for google and others in the audience ;-) - Those still on the samba 2.x ldap schema will find it clashes with 00core.ldif. Samba 2 defines pwdMustChange , as does 00core.ldif. Removing the pwdMustChange from the samba schema lets ns-slapd start, and samba works fine too. - openldap will let use use the syntax OID "1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.36" ( numericString - http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.36.html ) but ns-slapd won''t. Not really a problem - in our case, we were able to use 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 ( integer - http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27.html ) instead but others are available too :) As an aside, are user updates going to be allowed to the wiki soon? :-)
David Barker wrote:>> > - openldap will let use use the syntax OID > "1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.36" ( numericString - > http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.36.html ) > but ns-slapd won''t. Not really a problem - in our case, we were able to > use 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27 ( integer - > http://www.alvestrand.no/objectid/1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.27.html ) > instead but others are available too :)Yes, the list of RFC 2252 syntaxes which are supported in FDS is not complete. However, it doesn''t look very difficult at all to implement new ones. As a test to see if I could do it, I started working a few hours ago on implementing the syntax plugin for "numeric string" (basically copying and modifying int.c, and making the needed addition to another couple of header files), which might be done in a day or two.> As an aside, are user updates going to be allowed to the wiki soon? :-)I can''t answer that, but if you have a proposal for some new content, I could possibly add it there for you, e.g. I have write access but I can''t create accounts for others. BR, Mike
>> As an aside, are user updates going to be allowed to the wiki soon? :-) > > > I can''t answer that, but if you have a proposal for some new content, > I could possibly add it there for you, e.g. I have write access but I > can''t create accounts for others. >Nothing in particular, but we have quite a few ldap "things" on campus, some of which might be helpful to document in the wiki for other groups to look at (e.g. pgina, exim, SSO with pubcookie, and a million different "useful" perl scripts)