I''ve noticed that the ''ip'' keyword in ACI bind rules seems to have no effect on its own. For example, This does not deny access to IP 1.2.3.4: aci: (version 3.0; acl "Deny 1.2.3.4"; deny(all) (ip = "1.2.3.4");) But when combined with a userdn clause like this, it works: aci: (version 3.0; acl "Deny 1.2.3.4"; deny(all) (userdn = "ldap:///anyone") and (ip = "1.2.3.4");) Is this known/expected behavior? Just want to make sure I''m interpreting this right. Thanks a lot, -- George
George Holbert wrote:> I''ve noticed that the ''ip'' keyword in ACI bind rules seems to have no > effect on its own. For example, > > This does not deny access to IP 1.2.3.4: > > aci: (version 3.0; acl "Deny 1.2.3.4"; deny(all) (ip = "1.2.3.4");) > > > > But when combined with a userdn clause like this, it works: > > aci: (version 3.0; acl "Deny 1.2.3.4"; deny(all) (userdn = > "ldap:///anyone") and (ip = "1.2.3.4");) > > > > Is this known/expected behavior? > Just want to make sure I''m interpreting this right.Looks like it''s probably a bug in the aci code.> > Thanks a lot, > -- George > > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users