Hi all, I would like to first preface this e-mail by saying if this topic has been covered already, could someone point me to the month of the discussion and I will gladly read it. We have been using RHEL 3 / 4 in our environment and I am very happy and satisfied with the stability of the OS. Now with the new technologies incorporated into RHEL5, specifically Virtualization, Clustering, and Storage, and the costs associated with them, I was wondering how similar CentOS and RHEL 5 were. It is my understanding that CentOS is RHEL 5 with the RedHat icons removed but the functionality of the packages is the same. In addition, updates may come a day or two later than RHEL 5. My boss is a little concerned about the differences since we host production servers that require minimal downtime. Any thoughts and opinions are very welcome. Thank you for your input. Denise Lopez UCLA - Center for Digital Humanities Network Services Linux Systems Engineer 337 Charles E. Young Drive East PPB 1020 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1499 310/206-8216 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071206/66267175/attachment-0003.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2230 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071206/66267175/attachment-0003.jpg>
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:25:32PM -0800, Lopez, Denise wrote:> We have been using RHEL 3 / 4 in our environment and I am very happy and > satisfied with the stability of the OS. Now with the new technologies > incorporated into RHEL5, specifically Virtualization, Clustering, and Storage, > and the costs associated with them, I was wondering how similar CentOS and RHEL > 5 were.They should be identical.> > > It is my understanding that CentOS is RHEL 5 with the RedHat icons removed but > the functionality of the packages is the same. In addition, updates may come a > day or two later than RHEL 5. >Correct. In addition, I think the CentOS kernels are basically the "AS" kernels, and obviously there is no activation key, nor will you be able to use RHN for errata notification, etc.> > My boss is a little concerned about the differences since we host production > servers that require minimal downtime. >We typically continue to use RHEL for production stuff, and CentOS for anything non-critical. Not that CentOS wouldn't make a solid production server. Ray
on 12/6/2007 3:25 PM Lopez, Denise spake the following:> Hi all, > > > > I would like to first preface this e-mail by saying if this topic has > been covered already, could someone point me to the month of the > discussion and I will gladly read it. > > > > We have been using RHEL 3 / 4 in our environment and I am very happy and > satisfied with the stability of the OS. Now with the new technologies > incorporated into RHEL5, specifically Virtualization, Clustering, and > Storage, and the costs associated with them, I was wondering how similar > CentOS and RHEL 5 were. > > > > It is my understanding that CentOS is RHEL 5 with the RedHat icons > removed but the functionality of the packages is the same. In addition, > updates may come a day or two later than RHEL 5. > > > > My boss is a little concerned about the differences since we host > production servers that require minimal downtime. > > > > Any thoughts and opinions are very welcome. >The choice comes down to this; If you require to have a support contract, and a live person on the other end of the telephone when you have problems -- Use RedHat's offering and pay the support. If you are willing to test things on non-production servers, and use public resources to work through problems -- Use CentOS. The money you save on support costs will more than offset the cost of a few test systems to run updates through. CentOS uses the same system and source files that RHEL uses, and it is probably the distribution that is closest to the RHEL offering -- sometimes too close, because if it is broken on RedHat, it will probably be broken on CentOS also. The CentOS maintainers also have had success finding bugs and proposing fixes to the RHEL bug system, which benefits all. There are many commercial ventures running on CentOS and other similar works. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!