Back, After to get all informations i received, i put them in table as follow: see attachment file. Specialists can they tell me if they agree with my conclusions ? Thank's for your good job. Fabien. -- Fabien COMBERNOUS - IT Engineer eProcess - Parc Club du Millénaire Batiment n° 6 1025 rue Henri Becquerel - 34000 Montpellier FRANCE http://www.eprocess.fr - +33 (0)4 67 13 84 50
Nikita Danilov
2002-Oct-24 16:52 UTC
Re: [reiserfs-list] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II.
Fabien Combernous writes: > Back, > > After to get all informations i received, i put them in table as follow: > > see attachment file. > > Specialists can they tell me if they agree with my conclusions ? > > Thank's for your good job. > > Fabien. > > -- > > Fabien COMBERNOUS - IT Engineer > eProcess - Parc Club du MillИnaire Batiment n╟ 6 > 1025 rue Henri Becquerel - 34000 Montpellier FRANCE > http://www.eprocess.fr - +33 (0)4 67 13 84 50 > +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Features \ fs | xfs | ext3 | jfs | reiserfs | Comments | > +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | mmutable | N | Y | Y | Y | "Y" is not with same sens. Implementation is not same. Each one permit | > | append-only | | | | | some elements that other don't permit and reverse. xfs will have | > | | | | | | implementation in futur. | > +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | quotas | Y | Y | Y | Y | Again "Y" is not aqual. ext3 accept quota only on data-journaled | > | | | | | | filesystems, but all other journaled filesystem don't have data journal| > | | | | | | About reiserfs you need Chris patches. > +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | NFS | Y | Y | Y | Y | nfs works on all of them. You need at least reiserfs v3.6. > +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | samba | Y | Y | Y | Y | Since Samba is userspace, the fs shouldn't matter (2.2.4 or 2.2.5) | > +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | coda | coda is a file sys him self | / / / / | > +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > |data journal | N | Y | N | N | Only ext3 can take care of data by a data journal. All other journaled | > | | | | | | file systems have "only" a metadata journal. | > +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Reiserfs supports data journalling with yet another set of Chris patches: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mason/patches/data-logging/ Nikita.
Christoph Hellwig
2002-Oct-24 16:54 UTC
Re: [Jfs-discussion] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:45:30PM +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote:> | mmutable | N | Y | Y | Y | "Y" is not with same sens. Implementation is not same. Each one permit | > | append-only | | | | | some elements that other don't permit and reverse. xfs will have | > | | | | | | implementation in futur. |neither jfs or reiserfs support this..> +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | quotas | Y | Y | Y | Y | Again "Y" is not aqual. ext3 accept quota only on data-journaled | > | | | | | | filesystems, but all other journaled filesystem don't have data journal| > | | | | | | About reiserfs you need Chris patches.jfs doesn't support quotas.
Andreas Dilger
2002-Oct-24 17:08 UTC
Re: [ext3-users] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II.
On Oct 24, 2002 18:45 +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote:> +--------+------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | quotas | Again "Y" is not aqual. ext3 accept quota only on data-journaled | > | | filesystems, but all other journaled filesystem don't have data | > +--------+------------------------------------------------------------------+Granted that I have never used quotas, so it is possible that I am incorrect. However, my understanding is that yes, you do need data-journaled quota files to ensure that your quota tables don't miss some operations after a crash. However, you can separately select data journaling for files in ext3 (via chattr), even if the rest of the filesystem is using data=ordered (the default). Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
Oleg Drokin
2002-Oct-25 05:48 UTC
Re: [reiserfs-list] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II.
Hello! On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:45:30PM +0200, Fabien Combernous wrote:> +------------------+-----+------+-----+----------+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | NFS | Y | Y | Y | Y | nfs works on all of them. You need at least reiserfs v3.6.NFS will work with reiserfs v3.5 too, just there is a probability of having problems with reusing object ids (and therefore the inode numbers too).> |data journal | N | Y | N | N | Only ext3 can take care of data by a data journal. All other journaled | > | | | | | | file systems have "only" a metadata journal. |No. Chris Mason have set of patches that implement data journaling for reiserfs, too. Bye, Oleg
Reasonably Related Threads
- to compare journalised file systems with Linux.
- PDC.
- what is the faster way to search for a pattern in a few million entries data frame ?
- what is the faster way to search for a pattern in a few million entries data frame ?
- French Translation of the Shorewall Setup Guide