William_E._Dent/NBK/ULI%ULI@us.ul.com
2000-Aug-31 06:04 UTC
Out of Office Response: samba digest, Vol 1 #18 - 10 msgs
William E. Dent will be away from Wednesday August 30, 2000 to Tuesday
September 5, 2000. Mail is being forwarded to wedent@home.com.
Original Message Text follows:
----------------------------------------------------------
Send samba mailing list submissions to
samba@lists.samba.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
samba-request@lists.samba.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
samba-admin@lists.samba.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of samba digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Linux] Samba as Wins Server and Domain Controller (Tom Schaefer)
2. Re: Samba as Wins Server and Domain Controller (David Collier-Brown)
3. Re: Timestamps (David Collier-Brown)
4. Re: Samba : error with write_socket_data (David Collier-Brown)
5. Re: [Linux] Samba as Wins Server and Domain Controller (Michael
Marschall)
6. QUIERIO SABER QUE ES SAMBA Y RARA QUE SE UTILIZA (Asfalca)
7. Re: [Linux] Samba as Wins Server and Domain Controller (Gerry Maddock)
8. Re: configure not work (Feiqi(Frank) Zhu)
9. I'm new to all this... (Hatfield, Daniel)
10. configure error (Meredith, Daniel)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Reply-To: unixtom@hotmail.com
From: "Tom Schaefer" <unixtom@hotmail.com>
To: gerrym@futuremetals.com, linux@flux.org, alg@austinlug.org,
samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Linux] Samba as Wins Server and Domain Controller
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:13:03 EDT
As much as I love Samba, OpenSores, Linux and apple pie, setting Samba as
an
NT domain controller used to be a bit of a hack that required a lot of shoe
horning, and a lot of reading, and experimentation.
Get the books, sign up for the support email list and be prepared for a
bumpy ride.
The problem is that certain things *should* work a certain way, but such is
not always the case and you may do everything by the book and it doesn't
work as expected.
If the Samba code has been fixed, then maybe it's been upgraded to set it
up
easier - that's the biggest hassle.
Other than setup, everything I've read is that it works great. I have been
using Samba servers as NT replacements since about 1993 and I think that it
is one of the Linux solutions' greatest strengths. It's just the config
that
sucks.
Hopefully it's better than it was.
-t-
>From: Gerry Maddock <gerrym@futuremetals.com>
>What do you think works better: An NT Domain Controller and Wins Server,
or>Samba ?????
> What I'm actually looking into this is for storing Winblows
profiles
>on one server, browsing routed networks, etc...
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
--__--__--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:20:54 -0400
From: David Collier-Brown <David.Collier-Brown@canada.sun.com>
Organization: Priv ate Person
To: Gerry Maddock <gerrym@futuremetals.com>,
"linux@flux.org" <linux@flux.org>, txux
<alg@austinlug.org>,
"samba@samba.org" <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba as Wins Server and Domain Controller
Gerry Maddock wrote:
[whcih is better] An NT Domain Controller and Wins Server,
| or Samba ?????
| What I'm actually looking into this is for storing Winblows profiles
| on one server, browsing routed networks, etc...
I'm a Unix bigot, so I tend to reccomend making the
Windows clients member of an ordinary Unix-style
domain using Samba as a combined authentication, print and
file server, and managing the samba server as just
another server in a vax-free vaxcluster of servers (;-))
Windows domains are cool, but they start you down the
path to many individual servers and many many windows admins.
[We used to have 5 Win and OS/2 SMB servers: I replaced
them with one Unix box when the PC guy quit due to overwork]
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify some people
185 Ellerslie Ave., | and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain
Willowdale, Ontario | //www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/author.html
Work: (905) 415-2849 Home: (416) 223-8968 Email: davecb@canada.sun.com
--__--__--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:25:14 -0400
From: David Collier-Brown <David.Collier-Brown@canada.sun.com>
Organization: Priv ate Person
To: Jerome.Warnier@cec.eu.int, samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: Timestamps
Jerome asked:
| Anyone knows how to keep coherent timestamps on files put on a Samba
share?
Yup, Samba does that: have a look at
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/ch08_01.html#ch08-56646
for a hint (the book's also in docs/html, too)
--dave
[Ps: you accidently send that mail in html, which is unkind to the
list]
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify some people
185 Ellerslie Ave., | and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain
Willowdale, Ontario | //www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/author.html
Work: (905) 415-2849 Home: (416) 223-8968 Email: davecb@canada.sun.com
--__--__--
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:30:14 -0400
From: David Collier-Brown <David.Collier-Brown@canada.sun.com>
Organization: Priv ate Person
To: "Loic Mahe'" <mahe@twam.com>, samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba : error with write_socket_data
Loic Mahe wrote:
| There is a problem when the Win9x are connecting to the shares
| Sometimes (not on a regular basis), the connection to the share
| doesn't work (with an error message like "Network busy").
and
[2000/08/22 09:59:16, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(537)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2000/08/22 09:59:16, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(563)
write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 6: ERRNO = Broken pipe
[2000/08/22 09:59:16, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(751)
Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
It really was a network problem: the client
failed, disconencted and marked the shares
as doubtfull. When the user browsed them
again, it reconnected.
Suspect bad hubs, eternet settings (full/half duplex,
for example) or too much broadcast traffic.
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify some people
185 Ellerslie Ave., | and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain
Willowdale, Ontario | //www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/author.html
Work: (905) 415-2849 Home: (416) 223-8968 Email: davecb@canada.sun.com
--__--__--
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:26:08 -0400
From: Michael Marschall <mmarschall@voicerite.com>
Reply-To: mmarschall@voicerite.com
Organization: VoiceRite, Inc.
To: unixtom@hotmail.com
Cc: gerrym@futuremetals.com, linux@flux.org, alg@austinlug.org,
samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Linux] Samba as Wins Server and Domain Controller
I bought the Using Samba book from O'Reilly and read it and Samba is the
easiest thing in the world to use now. I highly recommend this book and so
does
the Samba team (the text is now included with the Samba source).
I have setup a NT Domain Controller at home for my windows NT testing
network
and it works very well on my 486.
Mike
Tom Schaefer wrote:
> As much as I love Samba, OpenSores, Linux and apple pie, setting Samba as
an> NT domain controller used to be a bit of a hack that required a lot of
shoe> horning, and a lot of reading, and experimentation.
>
> Get the books, sign up for the support email list and be prepared for a
> bumpy ride.
>
> The problem is that certain things *should* work a certain way, but such
is> not always the case and you may do everything by the book and it
doesn't
> work as expected.
>
> If the Samba code has been fixed, then maybe it's been upgraded to set
it
up> easier - that's the biggest hassle.
>
> Other than setup, everything I've read is that it works great. I have
been> using Samba servers as NT replacements since about 1993 and I think that
it> is one of the Linux solutions' greatest strengths. It's just the
config
that> sucks.
>
> Hopefully it's better than it was.
>
> -t-
>
> >From: Gerry Maddock <gerrym@futuremetals.com>
> >What do you think works better: An NT Domain Controller and Wins
Server,
or> >Samba ?????
> > What I'm actually looking into this is for storing Winblows
profiles> >on one server, browsing routed networks, etc...
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux mailing list
> Linux@flux.org
> http://www.flux.org/mailman/listinfo/linux
--
-==================================-
Michael Marschall
Infrastructure Manager
VoiceRite, Inc.
7725 NW 48th St.
Miami, Florida 33166
Phone / Fax / Pager : 305 436 1574
-==================================-
--__--__--
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 13:56:18 -0600
From: Asfalca <asfalca@telemovil.net>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: QUIERIO SABER QUE ES SAMBA Y RARA QUE SE UTILIZA
--__--__--
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:16:51 -0700
From: Gerry Maddock <gerrym@futuremetals.com>
To: unixtom@hotmail.com
Cc: linux@flux.org, alg@austinlug.org, samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: [Linux] Samba as Wins Server and Domain Controller
I love Samba, OpenSores, Linux and apple pie <<<< TOO FUNNY!!!
Thanks for
your
input!!
Tom Schaefer wrote:
> As much as I love Samba, OpenSores, Linux and apple pie, setting Samba as
an> NT domain controller used to be a bit of a hack that required a lot of
shoe> horning, and a lot of reading, and experimentation.
>
> Get the books, sign up for the support email list and be prepared for a
> bumpy ride.
>
> The problem is that certain things *should* work a certain way, but such
is> not always the case and you may do everything by the book and it
doesn't
> work as expected.
>
> If the Samba code has been fixed, then maybe it's been upgraded to set
it
up> easier - that's the biggest hassle.
>
> Other than setup, everything I've read is that it works great. I have
been> using Samba servers as NT replacements since about 1993 and I think that
it> is one of the Linux solutions' greatest strengths. It's just the
config
that> sucks.
>
> Hopefully it's better than it was.
>
> -t-
>
> >From: Gerry Maddock <gerrym@futuremetals.com>
> >What do you think works better: An NT Domain Controller and Wins
Server,
or> >Samba ?????
> > What I'm actually looking into this is for storing Winblows
profiles> >on one server, browsing routed networks, etc...
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux mailing list
> Linux@flux.org
> http://www.flux.org/mailman/listinfo/linux
--__--__--
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:33:02 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Feiqi(Frank) Zhu" <frankzhu@austin.ibm.com>
To: Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org>
Cc: samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: configure not work
Thanks for you guys's responses. You're right. the gcc in my machine
didn't
work right. I have downloaded a new gcc. It works now.
Thank,
Frank
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Feiqi(Frank) Zhu <frankzhu@austin.ibm.com>]
> > checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O ) works... no
> > configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler
> > cannot create executables.
> >
> > But I do have gcc in the $PATH
> > # type gcc
> > gcc is /usr/contrib/bin/gcc
> > # gcc -v
> > Reading specs from
> > /usr/contrib/depot/gcc2_8_1.913912630/rs_aix41/lib/gcc-lib/rs6000-ibm
> > -aix4.1.4.0/2.8.1/specs
> > gcc version 2.8.1
>
> As Urban says, the error is that gcc doesn't seem to be working
> properly. Check to see if you can compile and run a simple C program.
> Common problems are the lack of system header files and/or auxilliary
> utilities like `as' (the assembler) and `ld' (the linker/binder).
IRIX
> pre-6.2 or so actually didn't come standard with any of these things!
>
> Another thing to check, and this probably *isn't* your problem, is to
> re-run the gcc fixincludes script. gcc mangles your system header
> files to fix common errors with ANSI-compliance, C++-safeness, etc, and
> stores a local copy of anything it had to fix. That means that gcc
> compiled for 4.1.4 will have some outdated headers compared to 4.3.3,
> and these could conceivably cause problems in some applications.
>
> A third thing would be to try upgrading gcc. 2.8.1 is positively
> *ancient*, and had a reputation for being rather buggy. I've been
> running gcc 2.95.x on AIX for quite some time with no major problems.
>
> Peter
>
--__--__--
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:58:58 -0500
From: "Hatfield, Daniel" <Daniel.Hatfield@fiserv.com>
Subject: I'm new to all this...
To: "samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@us4.samba.org>
Ok, here=92s the scenario. I=92m a new Linux/Samba Admin. I come from the
Windows/Novell world and I=92m ready to start putting in some Linux server
s. We have already started converting all of our DNS servers. Now, I=92m
working on moving print services to Samba.
My first question (I=92m assuming I=92ll have many): How do I install an I
P printer in Linux.
Thanks,
Daniel
--__--__--
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:17:16 -0700
From: "Meredith, Daniel" <Daniel.Meredith.01@MCKENNA.EDU>
Subject: configure error
To: "samba@lists.samba.org" <samba@us4.samba.org>
Hello all,
I recieve this error trying to build samba 2.0.7 on Redhat 6.2 with kernel
2.2.16 and gcc 2.91.66:
--------------------------------------------------------
checking configure summary
ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe
configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config
The error happens during the configure and won't let me even try to build
the binaries.
Any ideas?
~Dan
===============================Daniel N. Meredith
http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~dmeredit
dan@search123.com
or
dmeredit@cs.hmc.edu
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
samba mailing list
samba@lists.samba.org
http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
End of samba Digest
Possibly Parallel Threads
Wisdom of the Ancients
