Fedora xen - Jul 2006 - compiling oprofile in FC5 for setting up xenoprof

I am trying to compile oprofile 0.9.1 after applying patches
xenoprof-2.0-oprofile-0.9.1.patch in FC5.

After I run ./configure, I did a make

I get the error . Has some one seen this before ?

 

make[2]: Entering directory `/root/oprofile-0.9.1/libpp''

if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..  -I ../libop -I ../libutil -I
../libdb -I ../libopt++ -I ../libutil++ -I ../libop++ -I ../libregex  -W
-Wall -fno-common -ftemplate-depth-50 -g -O2 -MT arrange_profiles.o -MD
-MP -MF ".deps/arrange_profiles.Tpo" -c -o arrange_profiles.o
arrange_profiles.cpp; \

then mv -f ".deps/arrange_profiles.Tpo"
".deps/arrange_profiles.Po";
else rm -f ".deps/arrange_profiles.Tpo"; exit 1; fi

arrange_profiles.cpp:93: error: definition of ''bool
profile_classes::matches(const profile_classes&)'' is not in
namespace
enclosing ''profile_classes''

make[2]: *** [arrange_profiles.o] Error 1

make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/oprofile-0.9.1/libpp''

make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1

make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/oprofile-0.9.1''

make: *** [all] Error 2

 

I have already built xen0 and xenU kernels. I am trying to get xenoprof
to run... 

           System details --- P6 processor and following OS details

 

           root@setst-p6y-02:~/oprofile-0.9.1# uname -a

           Linux setst-p6y-02 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 14
16:05:46 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

           root@setst-p6y-02:~/oprofile-0.9.1# uname -r

           2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp

 

 

Regards

Shobha Ranganathan

"The significant challenges we face cannot be resolved at the same level
of thinking we were at when we created them." Albert Einstein

"Ranganathan, Shobha" <shobha.ranganathan@intel.com> writes:
>  
>
> I am trying to compile oprofile 0.9.1 after applying patches 
> xenoprof-2.0-oprofile-0.9.1.patch in FC5.
>
> After I run ./configure, I did a make
>
> I get the error . Has some one seen this before ?
I see such errors when I try to compile *unpatched* upstream
oprofile-0.9.1.  The Fedora stuff compiles fine for me, with and
without Xen patch.  Have you tried that?