For those not on the devel/tester list or who may have missed it:> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:39:43 -0500 > From: Build System <buildsys@redhat.com> > Subject: rawhide report: 20060214 changes > To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com, fedora-test-list@redhat.com > Cc: > > Removed package kernel-xen >[snip]> kernel-2.6.15-1.1948_FC5 > ------------------------ > * Mon Feb 13 2006 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> > - go with the SMP workaround from Hubertus > > * Mon Feb 13 2006 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> > - 2.6.16rc3-git1 > - Merge kernel-xen back to kernel. > > * Mon Feb 13 2006 Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> > - rebase rawhide 1.1941.i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen support I guess this mean Xen will be more widely used in Fedora Core 5 deployements. This list also reached 150 subscribers today ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Ask Bjørn Hansen
2006-Feb-15 02:02 UTC
Re: [Fedora-xen] Fwd: rawhide report: 20060214 changes
On Feb 14, 2006, at 6:26 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:> i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen > supportThat''s excellent news. Yay! I usually use RHEL or FreeBSD, but on a box I got at home to replace a Very Old FreeBSD installation I installed Fedora expecting to in not-too-long be able to run FreeBSD under Xen. (I just use vmware- server for now). - ask -- http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 09:26:19AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:> For those not on the devel/tester list or who may have missed it: > > > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:39:43 -0500 > > From: Build System <buildsys@redhat.com> > > Subject: rawhide report: 20060214 changes > > To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com, fedora-test-list@redhat.com > > Cc: > > > > Removed package kernel-xen > > > [snip] > > kernel-2.6.15-1.1948_FC5 > > * Mon Feb 13 2006 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> > > - go with the SMP workaround from Hubertus > > > > * Mon Feb 13 2006 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> > > - 2.6.16rc3-git1 > > - Merge kernel-xen back to kernel. > > > > * Mon Feb 13 2006 Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> > > - rebase rawhide 1.1941. > > i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen support > I guess this mean Xen will be more widely used in Fedora Core 5 deployements. > This list also reached 150 subscribers today !And I also saw x86_64 support (but hadn''t had the chance to try it yet), thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Daniel Veillard
2006-Feb-15 09:24 UTC
Re: [Fedora-xen] Fwd: rawhide report: 20060214 changes
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 06:02:10PM -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:> > On Feb 14, 2006, at 6:26 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen > >support > > That''s excellent news. Yay! > > I usually use RHEL or FreeBSD, but on a box I got at home to replace > a Very Old FreeBSD installation I installed Fedora expecting to in > not-too-long be able to run FreeBSD under Xen. (I just use vmware- > server for now).Hum, we can''t garantee that you will get a workable paravirtualized FreeBSD DomU soonish, but instaling Fedora was an excellent idea ! ;-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Ask Bjørn Hansen
2006-Feb-15 11:56 UTC
Re: [Fedora-xen] Fwd: rawhide report: 20060214 changes
On Feb 15, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 06:02:10PM -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: >> >> On Feb 14, 2006, at 6:26 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: >> >>> i.e. at this point the Rawhide default kernel integrates the Xen >>> support >> >> That''s excellent news. Yay! >> >> I usually use RHEL or FreeBSD, but on a box I got at home to replace >> a Very Old FreeBSD installation I installed Fedora expecting to in >> not-too-long be able to run FreeBSD under Xen. (I just use vmware- >> server for now). > > Hum, we can''t garantee that you will get a workable paravirtualized > FreeBSD DomU soonish, but instaling Fedora was an excellent idea ! ;-):-) They are planning it for 6.1 (it might slip to 6.2 -- but I''d be surprised if it doesn''t come this spring or early summer). - ask -- http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/