Martin Pool
2002-Apr-24 18:03 UTC
[rproxy-devel] rdiff deltas not very good compared to pysync, why?
On 24 Apr 2002, "Shirish H. Phatak" <shirish@tacitnetworks.com> wrote:> Since there appears to be a dedicated group of users and lots of > activity, maybe we can convince Martin to roll in these patches and make > a new release?I have been really lax in supporting librsync for the last few months, because of a new job and taking over maintenance of rsync itself. Needless to say I'm delighted that people find it useful. I'd like it if Shirish and/or Donovan (or somebody else) could join in managing the package. I think it might be good to set up a small web site for librsync, as it seems at the moment there's more interest in librsync as distinct from rproxy. Even more important is to test and (if appropriate) merge the patches that have been sent in, and then make a new release. We can either keep it on samba.org or move to sourceforge or somewhere else; in either case I'll give you the appropriate access. Is anyone interested? -- Martin
Shirish H. Phatak
2002-Apr-24 18:48 UTC
[rproxy-devel] rdiff deltas not very good compared to pysync, why?
Hi Martin, I can definitely help in managing the librsync package, especially since I will be maintaining our local tree anyway. As of now, I don't have the resources to get the Windows stuff tested; however, I can handle the Unix side of things. Maybe Donovan would be interested in managing the Windows effort? I am fine with either Sourceforge or samba.org. I have used the former quite extensively during Intermezzo development, but most of my usage was CVS access, so I don't think either site would make much of a difference. -Shirish Martin Pool wrote:>On 24 Apr 2002, "Shirish H. Phatak" <shirish@tacitnetworks.com> wrote: > >> Since there appears to be a dedicated group of users and lots of >>activity, maybe we can convince Martin to roll in these patches and make >>a new release? >> > >I have been really lax in supporting librsync for the last few months, >because of a new job and taking over maintenance of rsync itself. > >Needless to say I'm delighted that people find it useful. > >I'd like it if Shirish and/or Donovan (or somebody else) could join >in managing the package. I think it might be good to set up a >small web site for librsync, as it seems at the moment there's more >interest in librsync as distinct from rproxy. Even more important >is to test and (if appropriate) merge the patches that have been >sent in, and then make a new release. We can either keep it on >samba.org or move to sourceforge or somewhere else; in either case >I'll give you the appropriate access. > >Is anyone interested? >