Has anyone succesfully compiled a PAPI+perfctr-enabled kernel? I've been mixing and matching instructions from the PAPI distribution and those from CentOS wiki to no avail. TIA -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina
On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:> Has anyone succesfully compiled a PAPI+perfctr-enabled kernel? I've > been mixing and matching instructions from the PAPI distribution and > those from CentOS wiki to no avail. > TIAFrom the perfctr-2.6.40 release notes: Version 2.6.40, 2010-01-30 ... - Updated kernel support: 2.6.32, 2.6.31, 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 and 2.6.18-164.el5 (RHEL5), 2.6.9-89.0.19.EL (RHEL4). I've not tried this but ealier versions on CentOS was trivial to patch in using the provided documentation. /Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20100428/32302fcc/attachment-0002.sig>
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Eduardo Grosclaude <eduardo.grosclaude at gmail.com> wrote:> Has anyone succesfully compiled a PAPI+perfctr-enabled kernel? I've > been mixing and matching instructions from the PAPI distribution and > those from CentOS wiki to no avail.You might want to read through this Forum thread: https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=25099&forum=37 The OP of that thread has a blog here: http://backedbyapenguin.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/centos-5-4-perfctr-and-papi/ Akemi
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [CSL #351425] perfctr-enabled C5 kernel anyone?
- Perfctr-Xen framework for performance analysis
- [LLVMdev] How to measure the overhead of instrumented code
- [LLVMdev] Measure execution time of each basic block
- [LLVMdev] Measure execution time of each basic block