Hi, What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB? This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations please :) ) What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so good points) Thank you, Adrian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3105 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090506/061dbaa6/attachment-0004.bin>
Hi,> Hi, > What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB? > This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations > please :) ) > What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so > good points) > > Thank you, > AdrianI personally would go XFS. Made the very best experiences of any filesystems I ever used (well, it was XFS on IRIX). Timo
Adrian Sevcenco schrieb:> Hi, > What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB? > This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations > please :) ) > What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so > good points) > > Thank you, > Adrian >Does anybody actually run such a thing on Linux? How long does a FSCK take once it's 80% populated? How much RAM does that need? The FSCK on my Virtuozzo-partition takes long enough - and it's only 500 GB or so. Rainer
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Adrian Sevcenco <Adrian.Sevcenco at cern.ch> wrote:> Hi, > What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB? > This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations > please :) ) > What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so > good points)We've got a 110 TB xfs system in production based on a logical volume striped over 9 boxes of SATA disk, works like a charm with great throughput as we stripe over 3 controllers :-) Only whoopsie in 18+ months was when we recently added 3 more disk boxes and I grew the filesystem. First attempt xfs_grow only added a fraction of the available space. Second attempt gave a kernel panic. Reboot and everything was fine with all space available. Lesson learned: don't use xfs_grow unless you're in the general vicinity of the server ;-) regards, Bent
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [PATCH 0/2] Allow xen guests to plug disks of 1 TiB or more
- Rsync Failed & /proc/kcore 128 TiB & NTFS HDD Makes Scary sounds even when not mounted
- ext3 4TB fs limit on amd64 (FAQ?)
- Rsync Failed & /proc/kcore 128 TiB & NTFS HDD Makes Scary sounds even when not mounted
- Rsync Failed & /proc/kcore 128 TiB & NTFS HDD Makes Scary sounds even when not mounted