Didier Raboud
2010-Apr-22 13:31 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#578749: logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect "session opened"
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.7 Severity: minor Tags: patch The /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect the "session opened" messages that are IMHO completely normal. The attached patch solves this. Cheers, OdyX -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information -------------- next part -------------- --- schroot.old 2010-04-22 15:23:56.000000000 +0200 +++ schroot 2010-04-22 15:24:14.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ schroot\[[[:digit:]]+\]: \(pam_unix\) session opened for user [-_.[:alnum:]]+ by ([-_.[:alnum:]]+)?\(uid=[[:digit:]]+\)$ -^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ schroot\[[[:digit:]]+\]: pam_unix\(schroot:session\) session opened for user [-_.[:alnum:]]+ by ([-_.[:alnum:]]+)?\(uid=[[:digit:]]+\)$ +^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ schroot\[[[:digit:]]+\]: pam_unix\(schroot:session\):? session opened for user [-_.[:alnum:]]+ by ([-_.[:alnum:]]+)?\(uid=[[:digit:]]+\)$ ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ schroot\[[[:digit:]]+\]: \[[-._[:alnum:]]+ chroot\] \([-_.[:alnum:]]+->[-_.[:alnum:]]+\) Running login shell: '[-._/[:alnum:]]+'$ ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ schroot\[[[:digit:]]+\]: \[[-._[:alnum:]]+ chroot\] \([-_.[:alnum:]]+->[-_.[:alnum:]]+\) Running command: ".+"$
Hannes von Haugwitz
2010-Apr-23 05:52 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#578749: Bug#578749: logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect "session opened"
Didier Raboud wrote:> > The /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect the "session opened" > messages that are IMHO completely normal. The attached patch solves this. >Can you please provide some sample log lines and/or a patch against the HEAD code in the logcheck git? Thanks Hannes
Debian Bug Tracking System
2014-Jan-24 06:39 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#578749: marked as done (logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect "session opened")
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2014 07:36:53 +0100 with message-id <20140124063653.GA19997 at carbon.vonhaugwitz.com> and subject line Re: Bug#578749: logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect "session opened" has caused the Debian Bug report #578749, regarding logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect "session opened" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 578749: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=578749 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Didier Raboud <didier at raboud.com> Subject: logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect "session opened" Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:31:37 +0200 Size: 3857 URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20140124/c71f216d/attachment-0002.mht> -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Hannes von Haugwitz <hannes at vonhaugwitz.com> Subject: Re: Bug#578749: logcheck-database: ignore.d.server/schroot fails to detect "session opened" Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 07:36:53 +0100 Size: 2128 URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20140124/c71f216d/attachment-0003.mht>