martin f krafft
2006-Sep-13 16:35 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] final decision on violations.ignore.d and de-escalation
Hi guys, I have the feeling that we have not yet reached consensus on what violations.ignore.d should be: - a set of filters that apply to violations; any line filtered will disappear completely from the logcheck mails - a set of filters that apply to violations; any line filtered will automatically be de-escalated to a normal system event. I think we must figure this out before etch. Could you please offer your input? If I don't hear anything before next week, I will assume that we want de-escalation, which seems to be the current way things are going. (logcheck is so ready for a rewrite from scratch...) -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems always remember you're unique, just like everyone else. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature (GPG/PGP) Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060913/7f5c6504/attachment.pgp