Hi,
on Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 23:40:01 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Can we please ignore SMART Usage and Prefailure attribute changes?
> The rationale is that smartd will send out separate email anyway
> when something bad happens.
>
> Comments?
smartd does send an email when some attribute failed, but not when one
changes dramatically which could mean something bad is about to
happen.
For example I do have (among others) a rule in my
ignore.d.server/local-smartd on one box that ignores changes of the
Hardware_ECC_Recovered SMART usage attribute in the range 46 to 48 for
a specific drive that did change that value in that range back and
forth regularly.
But at some point a few months ago the value did shoot up to about 70
and I was alarmed of this by logcheck and thus was able to take action
about 2 weeks before smartd started to report a failing self test for
the first time and finally unrecoverable errors.
So I do think that it is a good thing to receive these.
elmar
--
.'"`.
/"\
| :' : Elmar Hoffmann <elho at elho.net> ASCII Ribbon Campaign \
/
`. `' GPG key available via pgp.net against HTML email X
`- & vCards / \
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20060904/d85e3494/attachment.pgp