Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
2005-May-21 16:04 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#310080: udev: maybe include rules for use with logcheck?
package logcheck-database tags 310080 moreinfo thanks On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 15:22 +0100, Colm G. Connolly wrote:> It might be useful to include some rules for the logcheck package so > certain messages from udev can get ignored. > > Something like the attached file might do the trick.Can you provide the messages that should to be ignored? Thanks, -j -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20050521/5253734c/attachment.pgp
Debian Bug Tracking System
2005-May-21 16:18 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Processed: Re: udev: maybe include rules for use with logcheck?
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:> package logcheck-databaseIgnoring bugs not assigned to: logcheck-database> tags 310080 moreinfoBug#310080: udev: maybe include rules for use with logcheck? There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo> thanksStopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
2005-May-23 22:02 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Bug#310080: udev: maybe include rules for use with logcheck?
package logcheck-database tags 310080 = pending severity 307588 wishlist merge 310080 307588 thanks [Please ensure you Cc bugs.debian.org in any replies. Quoting full message because it wasn't.] On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 09:34 +0100, Colm G. Connolly wrote:> Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:<snip>> > On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 15:22 +0100, Colm G. Connolly wrote: > > > >>It might be useful to include some rules for the logcheck package so > >>certain messages from udev can get ignored. > >> > >>Something like the attached file might do the trick. > > > > > > Can you provide the messages that should to be ignored? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -j > > something like these > > May 22 06:47:51 darwin udev[22655]: removing device node '/dev/vcsa12' > May 22 06:47:51 darwin udev[22654]: removing device node '/dev/vcs12' > May 22 06:47:51 darwin udev[22682]: creating device node '/dev/vcsa12' > May 22 06:47:51 darwin udev[22663]: removing device node '/dev/vcs11' > May 22 06:47:51 darwin udev[22664]: removing device node '/dev/vcsa11' > May 22 06:47:51 darwin udev[22699]: creating device node '/dev/vcs11' > May 22 06:47:51 darwin udev[22703]: creating device node '/dev/vcsa11' > May 22 06:47:51 darwin udev[22706]: creating device node '/dev/vcs12' > May 23 06:30:24 darwin udev[31898]: removing device node '/dev/vcs12' > May 23 06:30:24 darwin udev[31912]: removing device node '/dev/vcsa11' > May 23 06:30:24 darwin udev[31911]: removing device node '/dev/vcs11' > May 23 06:30:24 darwin udev[31904]: removing device node '/dev/vcsa12' > May 23 06:30:24 darwin udev[31955]: creating device node '/dev/vcs12' > May 23 06:30:24 darwin udev[31957]: creating device node '/dev/vcs11' > May 23 06:30:24 darwin udev[31958]: creating device node '/dev/vcsa12' > May 23 06:30:24 darwin udev[31956]: creating device node '/dev/vcsa11'The udev workstation rules in CVS match these messages. I'm merging this with the other udev related bug filed against logcheck-database since they're reporting the same problem. -- -Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <jamie at silverdream.org> t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795 PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8 never send mail to: oubliette.z at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20050523/ce19d5a5/attachment.pgp
Debian Bug Tracking System
2005-May-23 22:18 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Processed: Re: udev: maybe include rules for use with logcheck?
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:> package logcheck-databaseIgnoring bugs not assigned to: logcheck-database> tags 310080 = pendingBug#310080: udev: maybe include rules for use with logcheck? Tags were: moreinfo Tags set to: pending> severity 307588 wishlistBug#307588: logcheck-database: Patterns in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.workstation/udev are too strict Severity set to `wishlist'.> merge 310080 307588Bug#307588: logcheck-database: Patterns in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.workstation/udev are too strict Bug#310080: udev: maybe include rules for use with logcheck? Merged 307588 310080.> thanksStopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)