Hi We are using asterisk 1.4.17 for the apt repository on an Ubuntu server and we're getting an odd problem with one customer using a Queue The queue is called in the dialplan with the options Tn The queue only has one member. Occasionally and starting to get more frequently the caller ends up being initially answered by the wrong extension (i.e. one that is not a member of the queue) Has anyone ever heard of an issue where on call in a queue is transferred but the transfer is actually actioned on a different call that is waiting in the same queue? Thanks in Advance Ish -- Ishfaq Malik Software Developer PackNet Ltd Office: 0161 660 3062
Ishfaq Malik
2010-Dec-16 14:42 UTC
[asterisk-users] Transferring problem within Queues [edit] Transferring problem with BLF buttons
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 14:33 +0000, Ishfaq Malik wrote:> Hi > > We are using asterisk 1.4.17 for the apt repository on an Ubuntu server > and we're getting an odd problem with one customer using a Queue > > The queue is called in the dialplan with the options Tn > The queue only has one member. > Occasionally and starting to get more frequently the caller ends up > being initially answered by the wrong extension (i.e. one that is not a > member of the queue) > Has anyone ever heard of an issue where on call in a queue is > transferred but the transfer is actually actioned on a different call > that is waiting in the same queue? > > Thanks in Advance > > IshI've been doing my own testing so can add some more information to my initial problem. I have set up my phone to use hints/subscriptions for the purpose of BLF Call A comes in and is answered by User 1 Call B comes in and is left ringing User 1 uses a BLF programmed button on a snom phone to call user 2 User 2 answers and accepts the call User 1 presses transfer on their phone Call B (which still has not been answered) is transferred to User 2 and not call A which stays on hold! If I do the same as above but press hold and dial the extension for user 2 and then press transfer call A is transferred to user 2 which is what I think we all would consider to be the correct behaviour. Has anyone ever come across this and found a reason (and possibly solution) for this issue? -- Ishfaq Malik Software Developer PackNet Ltd Office: 0161 660 3062