I don't quite understand the use case, but it sounds like you may be
trying to do shared line appearances (http://asterisk.org/node/48342).
You seem to be alluding that you want multiple extensions to share the
state of a single extension. If that is the case, then SLA isn't quite
that. Also, Asterisk SLA doesn't support a notion of call appearance
where a single extension can receive multiple calls.
--
Raj
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Tony Plack <Tony at plack.net>
wrote:> I am working on a project that requires shared extension. Where shared
line looks at the status of a line/trunk, shared extension would look at a
series of channels as the same "extension".
>
> The users would like to add destination channels on the fly, to provide
roaming extensions, but maintaining fixed channels as well.
>
> If a call comes in on an extension, the system needs to honor the fact
that channel 1 is busy, therefore, the extension is busy. Keep in mind that the
channel could be anything including SIP outbound trunk channels (read cell phone
or hotel room).
>
> The Dial command does provide a nice multi-channel dialer, especially with
the "r" option, however, if one of the lines is busy, the system will
keep ringing the other lines until timeout or answer (read voice mail).
>
> So I am contemplating adding a feature to the dial command, that would
make any channel busy, cause the initial Dial to come back as busy. Kind of a
force the state flag.
>
> Before I brake into code, does anyone have any other ideas?
>
> This would also help with phones like Grandstream, where you have 4
accounts to configure, and would like to have all 4 SIP accounts act as 1
extension.
>
> Tony Plack
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
--
Raj Jain
mailto:rj2807 at gmail dot com
sip:rjain at iptel dot org