Sanjay Rajdev
2007-May-10 14:01 UTC
[asterisk-users] socket_process: Received mini frame before first full voice frame
Anyone any idea why do we keep on getting chan_iax2.c:7535 socket_process: Received mini frame before first full voice frame Regards, Sanjay Rajdev
Sanjay Rajdev
2007-May-15 13:53 UTC
[asterisk-users] socket_process: Received mini frame before first full voice frame
Never received a response for this from anyone. This is being seen more frequently now. Please Suggest. Regards, Sanjay Rajdev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sanjay Rajdev" <sanjay.rajdev@featherstoneinformatics.com> To: "asterisk-users" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Cc: "asterisk-dev" <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 2:26:30 AM (GMT+0530) Asia/Calcutta Subject: [asterisk-users] socket_process: Received mini frame before first full voice frame Anyone any idea why do we keep on getting chan_iax2.c:7535 socket_process: Received mini frame before first full voice frame Regards, Sanjay Rajdev _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Eric "ManxPower" Wieling
2007-May-15 17:18 UTC
[asterisk-users] socket_process: Received mini frame before first full voice frame
Sanjay Rajdev wrote:> Never received a response for this from anyone. This is being seen more frequently now. > Please Suggest. > > Regards, > Sanjay Rajdev > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sanjay Rajdev" <sanjay.rajdev@featherstoneinformatics.com> > To: "asterisk-users" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Cc: "asterisk-dev" <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 2:26:30 AM (GMT+0530) Asia/Calcutta > Subject: [asterisk-users] socket_process: Received mini frame before first full voice frame > > Anyone any idea why do we keep on getting > > chan_iax2.c:7535 socket_process: Received mini frame before first full voice frame > >It means that the SECOND audio packet for the call arrived before the FIRST audio packet. I suspect that mini-frames are much smaller than the first frame/packet. Some routers may prioritize small packets over larger packets. This should be covered multiple times in the mailing list archives.