asterisk users - Nov 2006 - Zaptel drivers for Solaris?

I'm looking to build the zaptel drivers on a Solaris  10 X86 box.  I've 
found the driver source code on 
https://svn.sunlabs.com/svn/solaris-asterisk but this source is posted 
along with Asterisk 1.2.7.1  Does anyone know of a fresher version?  Is 
this code considered "somewhat ready for prime time use"?

Thanks,
Frank

On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 08:30:55AM -0500, Frank Tarczynski wrote:
> I'm looking to build the zaptel drivers on a Solaris  10 X86 box. 
I've
> found the driver source code on 
> https://svn.sunlabs.com/svn/solaris-asterisk but this source is posted 
> along with Asterisk 1.2.7.1  Does anyone know of a fresher version?  Is 
> this code considered "somewhat ready for prime time use"?
I thought it was for Solaris/Sparc anyway.


Steve

-- 
NetTek Ltd  UK mob +44-(0)7775 755503
UK +44-(0)20 79932612 / US +1-(310)8577715 / Fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
Skype/GoogleTalk/AIM/Gizmo/Mac stevekennedyuk / MSN steve@gbnet.net
Euro Tech News Blog http://eurotechnews.blogspot.com

The code from there is stable, and it has a lot of bugs fixed on it
that are fixed in later versions of the Asterisk 1.2 tree. The reason
it was forked is that the Asterisk developer community doesn't test
each release on Solaris and they put a lot of things into the code
that just plain won't work on Solaris, but work fine on Linux.

I have tested the code(on x86, not sparc) and it is very stable, and
the maintainers of the http://solarisvoip.com/ site are great to work
with if you find bugs or any issues with it not working with your
system.

MATT---

On 11/28/06, Frank Tarczynski <ftarz@mindspring.com>
wrote:
> I'm looking to build the zaptel drivers on a Solaris  10 X86 box. 
I've
> found the driver source code on
> https://svn.sunlabs.com/svn/solaris-asterisk but this source is posted
> along with Asterisk 1.2.7.1  Does anyone know of a fresher version?  Is
> this code considered "somewhat ready for prime time use"?
>
> Thanks,
> Frank
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

Solaris has poor support for anything in general. The Solaris version of
asterisk is outdated, and doesnt even compile correctly. Is one individual's
flawed testing your basis to use Asterisk on Solaris?

On 11/28/06, Frank Tarczynski <ftarz@mindspring.com>
wrote:
>
> I'm looking to build the zaptel drivers on a Solaris  10 X86 box. 
I've
> found the driver source code on
> https://svn.sunlabs.com/svn/solaris-asterisk but this source is posted
> along with Asterisk 1.2.7.1  Does anyone know of a fresher version?  Is
> this code considered "somewhat ready for prime time use"?
>
> Thanks,
> Frank
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061128/2a51e14f/attachment-0001.htm

Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
> Solaris has poor support for anything in general. 

maybe you are looking in the wrong places for support...

SOLARIS IS NOT LINUX

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061128/1fcf8072/signature.pgp