Has anyone got a working analog connection to POTS
wherein DTMF, *not* FSK is used to send caller id by
the telco switch towards asterisk?
I've tried Asterisk 1.2.10, SVN trunk, and SVN branch
but so far has been unsuccesful.
When asterisk receives a call, I can see from DEBUG
that chan_zap is able to pick up all DTMF digits like
so:
Aug 11 17:06:17 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: D on Zap/1-1
Aug 11 17:06:17 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: 0 on Zap/1-1
Aug 11 17:06:17 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: 2 on Zap/1-1
Aug 11 17:06:17 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: 8 on Zap/1-1
Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: 1 on Zap/1-1
Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: 1 on Zap/1-1
Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: 8 on Zap/1-1
Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: 8 on Zap/1-1
Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: 9 on Zap/1-1
Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read:
DTMF digit: C on Zap/1-1
but the number somehow does not get passed to
${CALLERID} variable.
in zaptel.conf:
callerid=asreceived
cidsignalling=dtmf
cidstart=polarity
does someone have a similar system that's working? I'd
like to know which asterisk and zaptel versions you
are running
Thanks,
Greg
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I was using zap but I ditched the PSTN for now. Try taking a look at: CALLERID(name) or CALLERID(number) instead. MARK. Greg Delgado wrote:> Has anyone got a working analog connection to POTS > wherein DTMF, *not* FSK is used to send caller id by > the telco switch towards asterisk? > > I've tried Asterisk 1.2.10, SVN trunk, and SVN branch > but so far has been unsuccesful. > > When asterisk receives a call, I can see from DEBUG > that chan_zap is able to pick up all DTMF digits like > so: > > Aug 11 17:06:17 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: D on Zap/1-1 > Aug 11 17:06:17 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: 0 on Zap/1-1 > Aug 11 17:06:17 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: 2 on Zap/1-1 > Aug 11 17:06:17 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: 8 on Zap/1-1 > Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: 1 on Zap/1-1 > Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: 1 on Zap/1-1 > Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: 8 on Zap/1-1 > Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: 8 on Zap/1-1 > Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: 9 on Zap/1-1 > Aug 11 17:06:18 DEBUG[5113]: chan_zap.c:4624 zt_read: > DTMF digit: C on Zap/1-1 > > but the number somehow does not get passed to > ${CALLERID} variable. > > in zaptel.conf: > > callerid=asreceived > cidsignalling=dtmf > cidstart=polarity > > does someone have a similar system that's working? I'd > like to know which asterisk and zaptel versions you > are running > > Thanks, > Greg > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >