Mike Dent
2005-Jul-16 11:38 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Voicepulse connect - unable to dial out, asterisk says "9696"
Hi, for some weeks now I have been unable to make calls via my voicepulse connect IAX account? When I attempt the console looks like this:- rt*CLI> -- Executing Dial("SIP/2008-cf55", "IAX2/NBhXXXXXX:XXXXXXN82@gwiaxt01.voicepulse.com/12124565900") in new stack -- Called NBhXXXXX:XXXXN82@gwiaxt01.voicepulse.com/12124565900 -- Call accepted by 66.234.228.160 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- Hungup 'IAX2/66.234.228.160:4569/1' -- Executing HasNewVoicemail("SIP/2008-cf55", "2002") in new stack rt*CLI> and Asterisk speaks back to me "96 96" And thats it!? I'm not aware I changed anything at this end. Asterisk 1.07. Thanks Mike
Mike Dent
2005-Jul-17 07:33 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Voicepulse connect - unable to dial out, asterisk says "9696"
Thanks, I had added more funds a couple weeks ago, however I just found this on the voicepulse connect KB:- Why do I hear error message '9696' when dialing with Asterisk? Question Why do I hear error message '9696' when dialing with Asterisk? Answer When making outgoing calls using the VoicePulse Connect! service, if you hear a message stating "9696", your account has been suspended for negative balance or misuse. Please contact technical support through the Account Center to resolve the issue. So it looks like even though I added $20 credit, I'm still suspended. Anyway I contacted them, lets see what happens. Mike On 7/17/05, S. William Schulz <swschulz@astrum.com> wrote:> Mike Dent wrote: > > > -- Called NBhXXXXX:XXXXN82@gwiaxt01.voicepulse.com/12124565900 > > -- Call accepted by 66.234.228.160 (format ulaw) > > -- Format for call is ulaw > > -- Hungup 'IAX2/66.234.228.160:4569/1' > > -- Executing HasNewVoicemail("SIP/2008-cf55", "2002") in new stack > > rt*CLI> > > > > and Asterisk speaks back to me "96 96" > > I seem to recall a similar error mentioned and the problem turned out to > be a need to add more funds to the account. I can't say that this is > the case, but it might be worth checking. > > S >