asterisk users - Jul 2005 - Stale nonce received?

The use of the nonce looks right to me. Can somebody point out what  
is going wrong here?



Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]:

Sip read:
REGISTER sip:voip.victoria.tc.ca SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 199.60.222.229:5060;branch=z9hG4bKUF2CCx
Max-Forwards: 70
To: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>
From: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>;tag=w23oUOnv7kR
Call-ID: ttyFw6I0GWKLqh6UA@199.60.222.229
CSeq: 1 REGISTER
Expires: 3600
Contact: <sip:pcnavideo@199.60.222.229>
User-Agent: VizufonSIP/0.2 (beta.EN.PULVER.Jun 02 2005)
Content-Length: 0


Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: 11 headers, 0 lines
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: Using latest request as basis request
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: Sending to 199.60.222.229 : 5060 (non- 
NAT)
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: Transmitting (NAT):
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
199.60.222.229:5060;branch=z9hG4bKUF2CCx;received=199.60.222.229;rport=5 
060
From: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>;tag=w23oUOnv7kR
To: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>
Call-ID: ttyFw6I0GWKLqh6UA@199.60.222.229
CSeq: 1 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: <sip:pcnavideo@199.60.222.17>
Content-Length: 0


to 199.60.222.229:5060
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: Transmitting (NAT):
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
199.60.222.229:5060;branch=z9hG4bKUF2CCx;received=199.60.222.229;rport=5 
060
From: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>;tag=w23oUOnv7kR
To: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>;tag=as504649c9
Call-ID: ttyFw6I0GWKLqh6UA@199.60.222.229
CSeq: 1 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: <sip:pcnavideo@199.60.222.17>
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="voip.victoria.tc.ca",
nonce="0f172b82"
Content-Length: 0


to 199.60.222.229:5060
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: Scheduling destruction of call  
'ttyFw6I0GWKLqh6UA@199.60.222.229' in 15000 ms
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]:

Sip read:
REGISTER sip:voip.victoria.tc.ca SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 199.60.222.229:5060;branch=z9hG4bKqPdzZ5cOZ
Max-Forwards: 70
To: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>
From: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>;tag=w23oUOnv7kR
Call-ID: ttyFw6I0GWKLqh6UA@199.60.222.229
CSeq: 2 REGISTER
Expires: 3600
Contact: <sip:pcnavideo@199.60.222.229>
Authorization: Digest  
username="pcnavideo",realm="voip.victoria.tc.ca",nonce="0f172b82",uri="s
ip:voip.victoria.tc.ca",
response="18f82168850c14ec2d125cda21c160ba"
User-Agent: VizufonSIP/0.2 (beta.EN.PULVER.Jun 02 2005)
Content-Length: 0


Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: 12 headers, 0 lines
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: Sending to 199.60.222.229 : 5060 (NAT)
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: Transmitting (NAT):
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
199.60.222.229:5060;branch=z9hG4bKqPdzZ5cOZ;received=199.60.222.229;rpor 
t=5060
From: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>;tag=w23oUOnv7kR
To: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>
Call-ID: ttyFw6I0GWKLqh6UA@199.60.222.229
CSeq: 2 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: <sip:pcnavideo@199.60.222.17>
Content-Length: 0


to 199.60.222.229:5060
Jul  4 14:37:04 WARNING[12919]: Stale nonce received from 'pcnavideo  
<sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>'
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: Transmitting (NAT):
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
199.60.222.229:5060;branch=z9hG4bKqPdzZ5cOZ;received=199.60.222.229;rpor 
t=5060
From: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>;tag=w23oUOnv7kR
To: pcnavideo <sip:pcnavideo@voip.victoria.tc.ca>;tag=as504649c9
Call-ID: ttyFw6I0GWKLqh6UA@199.60.222.229
CSeq: 2 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: <sip:pcnavideo@199.60.222.17>
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="voip.victoria.tc.ca",
nonce="5ea96a40"
Content-Length: 0


to 199.60.222.229:5060
Jul  4 14:37:04 VERBOSE[12919]: Scheduling destruction of call  
'ttyFw6I0GWKLqh6UA@199.60.222.229' in 15000 ms
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2371 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050705/1081d03f/smime.bin

Ian White wrote:
> The use of the nonce looks right to me. Can somebody point out what  is 
> going wrong here?
Yes, I agree, it looks correct. However, what version of Asterisk are 
you testing against? Current CVS HEAD adds 'stale=true' to the 401 
response, and I don't see that in your trace. If you are not testing 
against the most recent CVS HEAD, please do so.