Hello everyone! It has been a while since the 1.0.7 release, and I have fixed a lot of stuff since then. I think it's about time to make another release. I realize that there are still some outstanding issues, but it's nearly impossible to bring that down to zero. However, I'm open to discussion on anything that someone may feel is a "show-stopper". I am on IRC as "drumkilla" and also available by email if anyone has any questions or comments. Please test and report any issues on the Asterisk issue tracker, even if it is just a note saying that you have no problems at all! I will release 1.0.8 once I have had enough reports of people successfully running the latest code from the v1-0 branch of CVS. Thanks! Russell Bryant
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com
2005-Jun-01 16:11 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] 1.0.8 Release Candidate
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 17:18 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote:> I am on IRC as "drumkilla" and also available by email if anyone has any > questions or comments.Given that there are hundreds if not thousands of irc networks, do you mean freenode? -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050601/3ede0c97/attachment.pgp
trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote:> On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 17:18 -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > >>I am on IRC as "drumkilla" and also available by email if anyone has any >>questions or comments. > > Given that there are hundreds if not thousands of irc networks, do you > mean freenode?Well unless #asterisk is on a different net... :D Yes, freenode. (http://www.asterisk.org/index.php?menu=support) -- Cheers, Matt Riddell _______________________________________________ http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
On 6/1/05, Russell Bryant <russelb@clemson.edu> wrote:> > I am on IRC as "drumkilla" and also available by email if anyone has any > questions or comments. > > Please test and report any issues on the Asterisk issue tracker, even if > it is just a note saying that you have no problems at all! I will > release 1.0.8 once I have had enough reports of people successfully > running the latest code from the v1-0 branch of CVS.I just downloaded and compile the CVS-HEAD today (asterisk and asterisk-addons). They both compiled and seem to be stable on Fedora Core 3. I am having trouble however compiling add-ons on OS X. Asterisk compiles fine after upgrading the bison installation on 10.4.1 (I used DarwinPorts to upgrade to bison 2.0). But when I try to compile add-ons the I get a complaint from the compiler about the use of the -shared option. Is there a work around for this? root# make make -C format_mp3 all gcc -pipe -fPIC -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -shared -Xlinker -x -o format_mp3.so common.o dct64_i386.o decode_ntom.o layer3.o tabinit.o interface.o format_mp3.o powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.0: unrecognized option `-shared' /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: _main _ast_log _ast_format_register _ast_format_unregister _ast_update_use_count collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [format_mp3.so] Error 1 make: *** [format_mp3/format_mp3.so] Error 2 Michael
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Michael Stearne wrote:> On 6/1/05, Russell Bryant <russelb@clemson.edu> wrote: > > > > I am on IRC as "drumkilla" and also available by email if anyone has any > > questions or comments. > > > > Please test and report any issues on the Asterisk issue tracker, even if > > it is just a note saying that you have no problems at all! I will > > release 1.0.8 once I have had enough reports of people successfully > > running the latest code from the v1-0 branch of CVS. > > I just downloaded and compile the CVS-HEAD today (asterisk and > asterisk-addons). They both compiled and seem to be stable on Fedora > Core 3. I am having trouble however compiling add-ons on OS X.What does CVS-HEAD problems have to do with a 1.0.x release candidate? They are totally separate code trees.. -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place! KP-216-121-ST