James H. Thompson
2005-Mar-30 11:46 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Physically Small Box Asterisk Systems
Looking for reccomendations for a physically small box configuration that will do: Run Asterisk One T1 Card One LAN port Enough CPU power to handle encoding/decoding all 24 T1 channels to/from G.729a Someone mentioned the mini-ITX systems, but there seemed to be a concern about adequate CPU power for doing transcoding of more than a few channels. Thanks. Jim James H. Thompson jht@lj.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050330/91787cd6/attachment.htm
Google this...: site:lists.digium.com mini-itx Lots of good info in the archive on this one... Wiki http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+hardware+mini-itx For some nice mini-itx hardware examples check out.... www.mini-itx.com Also, you may consider Micro-ATX if you want to get a cube or small footprint desktop system that is still AMD or Intel Small Box is pretty relative... 8) Wiley ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of James H. Thompson Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:46 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Physically Small Box Asterisk Systems Looking for reccomendations for a physically small box configuration that will do: Run Asterisk One T1 Card One LAN port Enough CPU power to handle encoding/decoding all 24 T1 channels to/from G.729a Someone mentioned the mini-ITX systems, but there seemed to be a concern about adequate CPU power for doing transcoding of more than a few channels. Thanks. Jim James H. Thompson jht@lj.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050330/72284452/attachment.htm
As someone else mentioned, mini-itx is the way to go. One of the better motherboards you can get is the Via C3 series. It's 1.0 ghz processor. I can think of 2 good suppliers for these: www.idotpc.com <http://www.idotpc.com/> and www.logicsupply.com <http://www.logicsupply.com/> _____ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of James H. Thompson Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:46 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Physically Small Box Asterisk Systems Looking for reccomendations for a physically small box configuration that will do: Run Asterisk One T1 Card One LAN port Enough CPU power to handle encoding/decoding all 24 T1 channels to/from G.729a Someone mentioned the mini-ITX systems, but there seemed to be a concern about adequate CPU power for doing transcoding of more than a few channels. Thanks. Jim James H. Thompson jht@lj.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050330/1f27acb6/attachment.htm
Nathan C. Smith
2005-Mar-30 13:18 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Physically Small Box Asterisk Systems
If you can hold off for another half month or so Via is introducing a new board that will have a larger memory bus bandwidth. That should help some. They are also going to introduce a dual-processor mini-itx board due anytime as I understand it. -Nate -----Original Message----- From: Zeno Lee [mailto:zeno_lee@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:42 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Physically Small Box Asterisk Systems As someone else mentioned, mini-itx is the way to go. One of the better motherboards you can get is the Via C3 series. It's 1.0 ghz processor. I can think of 2 good suppliers for these: www.idotpc.com <http://www.idotpc.com/> and www.logicsupply.com <http://www.logicsupply.com/> _____ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of James H. Thompson Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:46 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Physically Small Box Asterisk Systems Looking for reccomendations for a physically small box configuration that will do: Run Asterisk One T1 Card One LAN port Enough CPU power to handle encoding/decoding all 24 T1 channels to/from G.729a Someone mentioned the mini-ITX systems, but there seemed to be a concern about adequate CPU power for doing transcoding of more than a few channels. Thanks. Jim James H. Thompson jht@lj.net <mailto:jht@lj.net> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20050330/a77d2e4b/attachment.htm
Peter Svensson
2005-Mar-30 13:55 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Physically Small Box Asterisk Systems
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, James H. Thompson wrote:> Looking for reccomendations for a physically small box configuration that will do: > Run Asterisk > One T1 Card > One LAN port > Enough CPU power to handle encoding/decoding all 24 T1 channels to/from G.729a > > Someone mentioned the mini-ITX systems, but there seemed to be a concern > about adequate CPU power for doing transcoding of more than a few > channels.The "physically small" part is a bit vague. We are using a small 1U rack mountable computer, a Fujitsu Siemens RX100. Nice, relativly cheap, fast and with a small footprint. Peter
tmassey@obscorp.com
2005-Mar-30 22:24 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Physically Small Box Asterisk Systems
asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com wrote on 03/30/2005 01:46:10 PM:> Looking for reccomendations for a physically small box configuration > that will do: > Run Asterisk > One T1 Card > One LAN port > Enough CPU power to handle encoding/decoding all 24 T1 channels > to/from G.729a > > Someone mentioned the mini-ITX systems, but there seemed to be a > concern about adequate CPU power for doing transcoding of more than > a few channels.There are P4-based Mini-ITX boards that should handle that just fine: http://www.caseoutlet.com/shopexd.asp?id=207 I *love* the Mini-ITX format. The VIA CPU leaves a lot to be desired performance-wise, but the format's nice. Tim Massey